MATERIALISM / PHYSICALISM – DEFINITION - EPILOG - Part 6 of 6 @2011

Dr. George Grebens

http://grebens.org

See also: http://WhichOnesAreScientific.com; http://grebens.com, and http://grebens.net

Update: 29 April, 2011

Original Post: 24 April, 2011

Having completed the article ‘MATERIALISM / PHYSICALISM – DEFINITION - Part 5 of 5 @ http://grebens.org’ it soon became evident that there was more to the subject. In Part 1 of 5 Materialism in Europe had an early historical beginning with positivism. This is what the dictionary definition reflects – a philosophical and ideological content. A longer historical view shows that in India materialism was associated with: a) axiomatic positions; b) proper rules-based behavior (e.g., Buddha); and c) sociological/ideological prescriptions: anti-religion/spiritualism; aspirations towards the lowest common denominator – e.g., perception of similarities among all human bodies, and peripheral similarities with animals (later developed into an evolutionary common ancestry, and link to primates); sensualist priorities; versions of dialectics (see Caravaka's views). This, in many ways, anticipated the modern materialists; d) the Early Greeks perceived atomism, molecularism (Democritus), and even a Genesis physical process without the Creator (see Figure 44).

At the end of article Part 5 of 5 there remained a lingering question about Materialism – what is materialism as a tool? What was it designed for? A tool is used to increase power, refine movement, perception and measurement of dimensions – at macro and micro levels, refine processes, specify, organize, diversify, coordinate, filter, etc. Intellectual and social tools include not only philosophies, ideologies, organizations, finance and management, but tools are designed to achieve specific, approximate, general, analytical results. Inevitably, we need to identify who uses such tools for what ends (purposes). Not all tools are scientific, i.e., part of a process that leads to 'accurate knowledge' - to achieve ‘conditional certainty;’ or used as a scientific method, which is used to convert ‘uncertainty’ to ‘conditional certainty’). In the case where some claim that materialism is equivalent to being scientific or implies that it is the scientific method (e.g., Marxism's 'dialectical materialism') this can only be conceived when the terms are defined within the materialistic scope (dictionary) and not outside of it.

A distinction should be made between ‘matter’ and ‘Materialism’. Materialism / Physicalism is not something that refers to an independent, objective reality. It is a synthetic view interpreted through the senses, information and programming flows, filtered and reconstituted as ‘reality’. At the same time Materialists cannot monopolize ‘matter’ since every ideology has addressed, defined and prioritized issues of matter - see article entitled – ‘The Econo-Mythological Vehicle’ @ http://grebens.org.

‘Materialism’ therefore, being an ideology, it also: a) has a view on ‘matter’; b) is used as a tool; and c) has a ‘mythology’ that specifically can be seen in its ideologically defined pseudo-scientific notions of: reductionism, relativism, algebraic rule-based operations, ‘luxury-syndrome,’ categorical subjective atheism, anti-religion, which later will specifically reflect a supremacist approach.

DESIGN AND OPERATION OF TOOLS

INTRODUCTION

Management principles help uncover the tool’s design and function. Management must address plans, functions, executive and supervisory functions, infrastructures. Knowledge must be refined, tested for accuracy to help remove ‘uncertainty.’ Its accuracy is stored in a knowledgebase that must be managed and in this book/articles/blogs I identify as the 3-Dimensional Management Model (3DMM) (see Figure 5 above). This is the best design that helps account for all management plans, infrastructures, rows, columns and functions as a network. This in turn allows for the identification and establishment of the 2-Dimensional Management Model (2DMM) (see Figure 45), which the materialists define by including the concepts and applications of: reductionism, relativism, empiricism, subjectivism, secularism, behaviorism, algebraic rule-based operations, ‘luxury-syndrome,’ atheism, anti-religion, modernism – and specifically reflect an almost invisible supremacist approach (see below).

Coupled with these ‘materialist’ axiomatic and procedural inclusions, they also identify the generic notion of ‘uniformitarianism’ – another quasi-scientific application:

Figure 40 -The Five Materialistic Uniformitarian Points:

1. Start by taking today’s/current events, conditions, rates and processes, and by
2. Extrapolating these to the past – to the beginning (e.g., the Big Bang, Steady State) and
3. Through statistical progression ('chance')
4. Lead through the simple-to-complex or primitive-to-modernist processes
5. That must be accomplished within the framework of a closed system – i.e., without any participating exterior force (e.g., divine entities, God)

Materialism’s foundational management structure – i.e., 2DMM (see Figure 45) lies not only at the foundation of the neo-evolutionary view, which today is supposed to be applied to biology only, but also to: sociology, politics, psychology, behaviorism, history, etc. When we compare 2DMM with 3DMM, it is evident that the materialists’ ideological limitations have truncated the 3DMM in a significant way. Instead of three infrastructures (management design, operations and style), the materialists’ 2DMM has only two infrastructures: management design and operation. The materialist has totally eliminated the 1) third infrastructure – management style with its nine plans: Ethics, Self-Image, Culture, Mgt Method, Attitude, Habit, and Quality/Linear; Dignity, Integrity, Self-Determination, and Dependence /Growth.

Furthermore, see Figure 45 above, the materialists have also removed / truncated / reduced two additional features of the 3DMM - the: Executive row from the remaining two infrastructures: 2) Management Design and 3) Management Operations. In Management Design (2) it removed its Executive plans: Planning, Organizing, Directing and Purpose, Objectives, and Strategy – a total of 6 Executive plans and in Management Operations (3) its Executive level plans: Planning, Organizing, and Directing.

The Materialists substitute these Executive plans and the Style Infrastructural areas by plans on the remaining approved Design and Operations Supervisory and Functional rows: Management Operations - Supervisory row - the plans: Leading [O4], Controlling [O5], and Implementing [O6]; on the Functional row: Optimizing [O7] Financial [O8], and Quality Control [O9] and on the Management Design - Supervisory row - the plans: Policy [D4], Procedures [D5], and Rules & Regulations [D6]; on the Functional row: R&D [D7] Economics [D8], and Productivity [D9].

So subjects such as: sociology, politics, psychology, behaviorism, history, etc. will only appear within the context of these 2DMM's 12 plans on two infrastructures, and would not include the Management Style or the Executive rows on two infrastructures. In these cases, both Management Style and Executive plans will be substituted and redefined in terms of the 2DMM 12 plans on two infrastructures.

For example, day to day activities, the media will broadcast, education will instruct, and the 'evolved' human psychology can only be presented within the context of the limited 2DMM's 12 plans at two infrastructures. These were ideologically defined for the ‘proletariat’ – the humanoid that 'evolved' from primates.

The higher fuller deck that exists within the 3DMM, i.e., Management Style, and the Executive plans on the Management Design and Operation are reserved, for example, for the ‘Dictatorship of the Proletariat' and the 'ruling internationalist Banker elite.' The humanoids (proletariat) are barred from these Executive areas at the pain of death. The Theory of Evolution and its infrastructural Materialist Ideology *1 are specifically designed to help maintain this truncated status quo, whose objective among many others is to eliminate Christianity. Specifically, because Christianity talks about man-is-made-in-the-image-of-God*2, contains an alternate legal history that begins with Creation *3 and continues to the New Testament; and the scriptures (Christian Bible) that contains the plan for man’s and society's self-perfection*4.

APPLICATION OF 3DMM

The Christian Bible's 3DMM is used here as a source that helps contrast the Materialist 2DMM. This contrasting value is recognized by the Materialists themselves. Specifically, the original Christian Bible’s 3DMM does not recognize the Materialists’ Ideological axioms*1 and its serious management limitations 2DMM.

In my previous publications, I spent much time in describing the 3DMM Management Design infrastructure, which provides the fundamental ‘body’ structure upon which other Infrastructures are networked. In this case, because Materialists eliminate the Management Style infrastructure, it is therefore necessary to clarify what Materialists object to.

The Management Style infrastructure within the 3DMM begins in the Executive row and in the directive column i.e.,with Ethics (S1). World literature abounds with speculations and teachings on ethics, however, the 3DMM begins by establishing the Executive Row with fundamental principles – specifically:

a) Geometric natural law, geometric solids, the inheritance principle and with qualitative/infrastructural energy flux density, which lie at the foundation of all that is divinely Created*5

b) Distinguishes between alternate orientations of purpose – the ‘Tree of Life’ or ‘Tree of the Knowledge of Good & Evil’ (death). This is not only the enactment of free will – decision-making and problem-solving (see D4 on the Management Design level) but also assignment of an Executive Function. In other words, instead of following the true perfect will of the Eternal Lord God, as angels do, man is given an opportunity to accept another alternative – i.e., follow his own less than perfect alternatives – thus assign his own priorities and becoming a ‘god’ unto himself*6. Note: the alternate view to geometric natural law, geometric solids, and qualitative/infrastructural energy flux density (i.e., ‘a’), is the algebraic subjective relative rules-based (not laws) approach*7.

c) This choice distinctions place man in correspondingly different relationships with the Eternal Lord God. By following God’s creative Will places man in a family-son/daughter relationship with the Eternal Lord God. The contrarian alternate choice places man in a competitor, opponent (e.g., the true definition of ‘opponent’ is ‘satanic’) position to the Eternal Lord God. Adam and Eve have been escorted out of the executive Garden of Eden (executive boardroom), into the outer domain where now they could suffer the consequences of their imperfect choice: pain, labor, suffering and fragmentation – the less perfect world.

d) The implementation of either decision automatically changes the outcome of Creation. The first choice – cooperation with perfection would lead to the fruits of the Tree of Life – Adam and Eve would have become spiritual beings – as Jesus Christ after the Resurrection. This state would lead to everlasting perfect and delightful creations in Eternity. The second outcome would lead not only to the drop of all Creation down one cycle on the qualitative/infrastructural energy flux density, but would introduce death, a qualitative energy flux drop on the infrastructures and live cycles. This has become evident not only in the singularities: 2nd, 3rd (hydro-tectonic Flood), but also in ever finding the perfect tools and solutions that existed before the 2nd and 3rd singularities, that would have helped arrest degradation in the inner and exterior environments. Temporary improvements can be achieved when under favorable conditions civilizations improve accurate knowledge (science) and use of proper scientific methods (use tools to overcome ‘uncertainty’). But in a universal drop of energy flux density, such perfect tools degrade together with the universe.

Let us look at another example: With the introduction of the 2nd singularity – the choice of the imperfect executive choice; and 2262 years later with the consequences that led to the 3rd singularity (the hydro-tectonic Flood), there occurred a dramatic deterioration of the perfect man and his descendants. The freedom of choice also affected the integrity of man’s structural condition. To describe this simply, Man’s mind, emotions and body evidenced a network breakdown and fragmentation. Man’s Supervisory plans (psyche, soul faculties) separated/broke with man’s Executive plans (purpose, objectives, strategy, ethics, self-image, culture, etc.); while the Functional plans (body, processes, productivity, etc.) disorganized themselves from the first two [executive (spirit) and supervisory (soul/psyche functions). The Eternal Lord God took a calculated risk in creating man with free choice - decision-making and problem solving (D4). All was done due to the freedom given. Man became a sick entity that needed perpetual self-reparation (repentance). The Russian Orthodox Church is perhaps the only entity left that still recognizes this dilemma and the road to a solution. Jesus Christ is the Eternal Lord God of the Christian Old Testament that was born in an Adamic original perfect form (5 B.C. or 5417 Year from Creation (YFC) to close the loop and re-introduce the solution - i.e., the Tree of Life – now the Resurrection and change is the means that saves mankind form the pre-destined eternal death verdict.

Residing under the conditions of the 2nd and 3rd singularities, no man, religion, organization, international banking associates would ever be able to remove death from our existential equation. Some may theorize about some reparations at the info-nano-high-tech sub-chromosomal level, or transfer man’s ‘essence’ to some cyborg configuration? The bankers who would afford such transmigrations forget that they don’t have the original 3DMM key before it disintegration during the 2nd singularity. What about matter-energy-time that underwent dramatic energy-flux reduction by at least one cycle down the energy flux density throughout the universe? Today, the economics of matter-energy-time and a few other components are in a non-reversible state and condition. The tools and processes that would be attempted in this cosmic reparation have also been irreversibly degraded.

APPLICATION OF 2DMM

The above discussion simply addressed some aspects of Ethics (S1) in the 3DMM’s Management Style infrastructure that is not addressed, is eliminated (reduced, relativized) from the 3DMM due to the 2DMM’s materialistic ideological axioms*1.

How do the everyday materialists and their elite managers address this Ethics (S1) issue on their truncated 2DMM? For the everyday materialist the elite managers simply substitute and redefine Ethics in terms of what exists within the plans at two infrastructures - the 12 plans within the 2DMM. In this case [Ethics (S1)] is substituted by the Supervisory row - located at the Management Design 'Policy' (D4)

The elite materialist dictatorship manages on the Management Design Executive level: 'Purpose (D1); 'Objectives' (D2) and 'Strategies' (D3) and these results are converted into Policies (D4) for implementation throughout the Supervisory and the Functional rows, at the Management Design and Management Operational levels - a total of 12 plans (D4-D9 and (O4-O9).

Once Policy (D4) - i.e., Guidelines for Decision-Making and Problem-Solving results have been coded for the Administrative, Operational, Maintenance, Safety, Security, Emergency implementation, this implementation is further refined via Procedures (D5) and Rules & Regulations (D6). This then formulates the scope of the 2DMM 'Ethics'.

The rank-and-file materialist may or may not suspect where such 'Ethics parameters' emerge. Yet, the elite bankers' associates secretly control the Executive row's Purpose [D5], Objectives [D2], and Strategies [D3] to help create, introduce and implement any 'Luxury Syndrome' and 'Zombiist' directives that they wish (see 'Science & the Scientific Method - Parts 1, 2, 3' @http://grebens.org). Coupling these with advanced 'marketing', the 'Ministry of Truth' (Orwellian) controlled media promotions and enforcement. In this way, the elite can direct the rank-and-file materialist towards any initiative, towards higher productivity quotas, suicidal and terrorist missions, to commit grand genocide (e.g., Bolsheviks), perform pseudo-science [Policy (D4)] i.e., 'Luxury Syndrome' & Zombiism (see above reference) ; and publically promote it as a scientific method, guideline, and through rabid debunking methods by using the 'National Academy of Sciences' Rule Book - Case #2' @http://grebens.org).

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

[S2] Self-Image on the 3DMM procedurally follows Ethics [S1]. We find why the 2DMM rejects this Management Style plan, since Self-Image (S2) reflects the Genesis described perfect option of a perfect integrity of man/woman, who potentially could have followed their way to the Tree of Life - becoming sons/daughters of God. Whereas, their choice of the fruit of the 'Tree of Good and Evil': left them broken, fragmented, sick and dying; b) searching for something to cover their nakedness and handicap by any means - whether in the beginning with fig leaves or later to cover their illogical, insensitive and defective and illegal thinking; or later (their descendants) for evident abnormalities, social incoherence, subject to and generating propaganda, and deception . Seek camouflage, find means to re-direct possible unwanted results and counter effects, or resorting to threat, etc. to produce some kind of self-image that is acceptable in the environment where they live and influence; and c) hide from righteous authority.

On the other hand, those who wish to resolve/heal their sick conditions will ‘repent’ – find every mean to re-examine their fragmented (sinful, law-violating) condition and find God’s support and means (e.g., prayer, fasting, restitution, adhere to the 10 commandments, beatitudes, etc.). They will make a lifelong effort to correct the fragmented networks (personal, social, cultural); including the fragmentation inherited from ancestors or as results of mixed marriages with outsiders or heathens (see 2nd Commandment).

To substitute Self-Image [S2] challenges on the 2DMM, 'materialists' and potential materialist converts are directed to the 2DMM's lower infrastructural plans. These are located at the Management Design level that include: Policy [D4] – where they use a camouflaged Zombiist quasi-'self-image' views to decision-making and problem-solving; Procedures [D5] - which are derived from Policy, offer an over/simplified flowchart of behavior (reductionism); Rules & Regulations [D6] – identify specific do's & don'ts  - compliance, righteous looking rituals and behavior; Research & Development [D7] – distorted etiquette, surface acceptable/promoted behavior, fashion; Economics [D8] – expense to form impression, competitive attraction, expressive leadership; Productivity [D9] – favorable customer relations, meet what is understood to be a new orientation of 'customer needs', satisfaction, delight. Such Management Design level Self-Image is designed either to get satisfaction, to project a superior competitive image based on a few rather than integral features; or through compliance, threat or bluff. This is where we identify unadulterated hypocrisy.

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

[S3] Culture which procedureally follows Ethics [S1] and specifically Self-Image [S2] on the Management Style’s 3DMM's infrastructure is aimed to establish a full 'communion of saints'. One of the best attempts to establishing geometrically natural law-based societies had been that of the formation of the United States of America. Americans at that time clearly recognized their colonially degrading situation; what they were fighting against and what they stood for. They recognized the non-monetarist-Imperial-colonial civilization/cultural establishment. Yet they established a true alternative and positive cultural model. The Fathers of the American War of Independence recognized that Apostolic Christianity contained the geometric natural laws, and this is why they promoted Christian ideals that are evident in everything they had promoted. The Freemasonic element was diverted from Babylonian version to that represented by the ideals of the Society of Cincinnatus – that also offered a geometrical natural law-based option - the Repulic. This option allowed man to self-perfect himself and society by discovering new qualitative (infrastructural) laws of physical economy and interrelations that dramatically increased innovation, technoloical development, a banking system based on credit rather than the destructive and colonial Monetarist Systeml This credit-based banking system was later re-introduced as the Glass Steagall Act (1993) that protected American Banking during a deep depression launched by the Monetarists (Federal Reserve, Taxation, Wall-Street, British Imperialism). The Fathers recognized the dignity, integrity, self-determination and protection of the Crhistian family which became the nucleus of this new booming culture.

The substitutefor Self-Image [S2] on the 2DMM – is also located on lower infrastructural plans on the Management Design and Operational levels where we find the notion of 'collectivism.' This is also established by the elite that directs: Policy [D4] - effective and pre-set decision-making and problem-solving via the 'Luxury Syndrome' which leads to 'Zombiism' (see 'Science and the Scientific Method - Definitions - Zombiism' @ http://grebens.org); to Procedures [D5] - the most simplified economical flowcharted steps, to behavior conditioning; to the Rules & Regulations [D6] plan, which is equivalent to 'emotions' on the psychological plan (see Figure 5 and Table 3 in my blogs and Books). We have proactive conditioning coupled with compliance, public events and regulated behavior with its purposes of submission (e.g., TSA groping). The Research & Development [D7] plan - ensures proper respect for the right authority, training for compliance, neutralization of 'alien' 3DMM-derived behavior, pervasive awareness of surveillance, ethical and racial relativism, language and thought control, set of taboos, media control. The Economics [D8] plan – no private property, all belongs to the 'Dictatorship of the Proletariat,' serfdom, quotas. The Productivity [D9] plan – statistically measured productivity, housing regulation, family under social management. Such Management Design level of 2DMM 'Culture' is designed to ensure total population and resource control under threat reflects a dedication to State security rather than individual or family security.

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

A similar approach is evident for all the remaining  Management Style plans.

[S4] – Management Method within the 3DMM - let's summarize:  the plan Management Method implements its Executive plans: Ethics (S1) , Self-image (S2), Culture (S3) and thus the Management Method reflects, conducts and implements within the basic principles of: geometric natural law, geometric solids and the infrastructured energy flux density. Management Method functions are designed to serve the short and long-term improvements of the citizen, society and culture; and to the infrastructure – economic, technological, and educational.

On the other hand, 2DMM – management is established on algebraic relative rules. Is essentially authoritarian – distinguishes between the State which is ‘above the law’ and the legally underprivileged serfs, who have no rights. Rules (not laws) are continuously implemented to reduce the population’s dignity, and lead towards immanent serfdom. Example: the TSA Airport Scanners (microwaves are set at up to 99 times over the safe limits) dangerous to humans, and pervasive pat-downs with unhygienic gloves (from person to person)are essentially sexual harrassment, insults, molestation and abuse. Is such ‘inspection’ used to identify terrorists (Al-Qaida), or is it an ideologically-alien government terrorist operation that trains the population for the status of unprivileged serfs. The State promotes un-Christian management and behavior.

Over the years, the State judicially and unconstitutionally has been removing all moral and public Christian indicators – 10 Commandments, Prayer in School, limits Christian activity through Tax codes, and at the same time, legalizing phallic religious practices (TSA); redefines marriage, promotes anti-Christian religions/ideologies (this includes Neo-Evolution); legislating Hate-Crime Laws 'pre-thought crimes' exclusively aimed at shutting down the population's majority – the Christian population – evidence of galloping secularization and collectivization. All of these are secret International Banker policies that had been so evident since Babylon 1 from 2840 B.C.*8

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

[S5] – Attitude: 3DMM & 2DMM When an aircraft is about to land, it’s behavior in the air before it is about to land, will reveal its ‘attitude’ – behavior on whether or how it will reach its objective (landing). Similarly, the Attitude (S5) can help determine – through verbal, behavioral or ‘non-verbal communication’ which objective will be reached.

On the 3DMM Attitude [S5] holds a central position on the 3DMM’s Management Style infrastructure. Needless to say, the 2DMM is removed together with the Management Style on which Attitude exists. 2DMM substitutes Attitude [S5] by Procedures [D5] on the Management Design infrastructure (see Figure 45).

Attitude [S5] on the Management Style (3DMM) not only reflects what is going on and the condition in the surrounding plans i.e., on both the Management Style and below, on the Management Operations infrastructures), but also affects these plans in various ways by adjusting itself to past and existing conditions. Yes, Attitude provides predictable results – we can forecast how and where 'it' will land. The Attitude of people, organizations, societies, governments and cultures reflect the intent and source of the intent revealing the type of Executive and Functional infrastructures, as well as the type of column Directive and Info-base plans exist. The above paragraphs provide enough information about the Executive plans to help us predict and interpret the Attitudes [S5] in 3DMM and 2DMM environments.

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

[S6] – Habits are based on repeated and/or learned patterns of experience of behavior within the various plans on various infrastructures. There may be many similar habits (patterns of behavior) but there are enough potential variations that reveal the differences between cultural 3DMM and 2DMM differences. What is important is to distinguish between one or two types of similar behaviors, is to identify one or a series of behaviors that reflect differences among three infrastructures – e.g., the central plans – Procedures [D5], Controlling [O5] and Attitude [S5), or Ethics (S1), Planning [O5] and Purpose [D1], or Economics [D8], Finance [O8] and Dignity, Integrity and Self Determination [S8]. In some cases the materialist who uses 2DMM won't realize that there are links among some plans and infrastrucdrures that do not appear on the 2DMM - they are invisible - e.g., see Figure 45 - the links: Purpose (D1); Organizing (02) and Culture (S3). All of these are in the Executive and Stylistic areas.

It is also here, that we can distinguish the difference between the Republic and a Democracy. There is a dramatic if not a suicidal difference that most people don’t recognize. Sometimes, two systems may be similar on the surface, but their behavioral habits and what they prioritize are totally different. Proportionately to its population and industry, a large hierarchal government usually reflects habits of vulnerability and an obsession for security; while a small government feels protected by its people. A secularist government will be obsessed by the threat of a Christian population, while a Republic (based on geometric natural law) considers a Christian population a blessing. These repeatable habits are common throughout history.

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

[S7] – Quality/Linear – As it has been shown above the 3DMM which includes the Management Style also includes Geometric Natural Law, Geometric Solids, the inheritance principle, Energy Flux Density and also the Management Change Principles. Inevitably, due to the Materialist Ideological axioms, its approach shows not only a subtraction of infrastructures and executive plans, but also a repeated linearity at infrastructural changes (see Figure 16 - Study of Qualitative Change Types' also below).

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

[S8] – Dignity/Integrity/Self-Determination – The 3DMM when properly constructed, maintained and updated inevitably reflects dignity, integrity and self-determination within geometrical natural law, while the 2DMM provides evidence for the violation of dignity, integrity and self-determination. This is because of the materialists' manipulated infrastructures, plans, rows, and columnar plans.

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

[S9] – Dependence or Growth – The 3DMM contains an open system that is constantly updatable – ensuring verified and accurate knowledge in its 3DMM – this balanced and sustainable growth. While due to ideological limitations the materialist uniformitarian 2DMM is constrained to have all plans to be highly regulated by those who manage the executive plans and the management style infrastrudcture - thus 'dependence.'

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

Figure 16 – Study of Qualitative Change Types

Before concluding, it may be worthwhile to include a brief study of Figure 5 - Qualitative (infrastructural) Change Management. Based on Billions of Dollars of project management experience in various industries, we can clearly see a difference among four to five levels of qualitative change management. This should help answer a few definitions and concepts in the debate – Evolution, Creation, Intelligent Design, Hybrids.

In Figure 5 we can clearly show the differences among the four to five levels of qualitative change. Facilities, Plants, Process Engineering can clearly help define at least its 4 levels of change in a workable way: 1. Copy; 2. Change, adaptation, micro-change; 3) Improvement, re-engineering, macro-change; 4) Innovation, re-design, mega-change; and 5) Invention, breakthrough, conscious self-change. Neo-Evolution scientists can only theorize up to the 2nd level of management change and then linearly repeat the same process environmental stress, statistical randomness - chance) to account for all higher qualitatitive/ infrastructural changes (see ‘NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENTISTS’ RULE BOOK,’ @ http://grebens org; also ‘SCIENCE AND THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD 1, 2, 3’ @ http://grebens org; also ‘LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE AND THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD 1- 12’ @ WhichOnesAreScientific.com.

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

CONCLUSION

It is now clear that besides posing as a ‘scientific tool’ of true reality, Materialism clearly is a tool designed to help achieve other purposes.  Materialism as a tool is used to reduce all religions and civilizations and is not designed to prove true scientific evidence. In fact, many have known, or now begin to awaken to the reality that Materialism is:

1. Not designed to pursue the scientific ‘conditional certainty,’ but to ensure the continuity of ‘uncertainty’
2. To reduce all ideologies/religions and civilizations with the help of Freemasonry, Babylonianism, Fascism, Bolshevism, Communism, and Modernism - who adhere the materialist uniformitarian matrix
3. And after having reduced all ideologies/religions and civilizations to then promote and ensure the global ‘snake’/Babylonian alternative only – see Part 2 of 6 in this series of articles.
4. A tool that is used to destroy non-Babylonian mythologies and civilizations and specifically aimed at Christendom that has originated from the Biblical Patriarchs*9.
5. To have its adherents subjected to a truncated thinking management process that renders them into robotons, serfs, proletariat who mindlessly will fulfill all that the invisible ‘superior’ group of associates direct them to do. The 2DMM is specifically designed for this purpose. George Orwell’s ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’ has perhaps provided the best representative blueprint for this sinister end.
6. A supremacist tool since it is used to ensure the final success of the Babylonian religion*8

The Materialist Tool is destructive in every way. It is not even a tool to help support itself (materialism).It is a means to an end. Instead of having the materialist tool help resolve ‘uncertainty,’ it is, instead, used not only to geometrically promote and ensure the continuation of ‘uncertainty,’ but also to neutralize ‘conditional certainty.’ The materialist tool is designed to confront the ‘conditional certainty’s knowledgebase through: relativism, reductionism and behavioral conditioning to forget the past (self-brainwashing) rendering them into Orwellian enslaved amnesiacs. The last century’s practical aspects of science and technology have been used to simply enslave the serfs, proletariat, and democratic peoples under increasing totalitarianism (e.g., dictatorship of the programmed proletariat).

This has become particularly evident from the 2008 World Financial Derivative fiasco. Now there is no safe haven anywhere on Earth. As a tool, Materialism is used to distinguish between: a) the manipulating controllers - those who secretly use the economic (materialistic) means for self-interest; and b) against the increasingly quantitatively diminishing people, groups, societies, nations, and civilizations that must serve the purposes of the first (‘a’).

Paradoxically, Materialism has not been used ‘scientifically’ to establish futuristic utopias; instead this tool is destructive, dehumanizing, it helps to achieve never ending genocidal ends. This materialistic tool is used to distinguish between its users and the users’ managers – who now have successfully stolen all of the Earth’s assets, and reflect the image of the ancient capricious pagan gods.

Happy Easter!

References---------------------------------

*1 Materialist ideology includes axioms of: reductionism, relativism, empiricism, subjectivism, secularism, behaviorism, algebraic rule-based operations, ‘luxury-syndrome,’ atheism, anti-religion, modernism – and specifically reflect an almost invisible supremacist approach. Coupled with ‘materialism’ we inevitably identify the generic notion of ‘uniformitarianism’ – another quasi-scientific application:

Figure 40 -The Five Materialistic Uniformitarian Points:

1. Today’s/current events, conditions, rates and processes, and by
2. Extrapolating these to the past – to the beginning (e.g., the Big Bang) and
3. Through statistical progression ('chance')
4. Lead from the simple-to-complex or primitive-to-modernist processes
5. All accomplished within the framework of a closed system – i.e., without any participating exterior force (divine entities, God)

*2 Genesis 1:27 “So God made man: in the image of God He made them.’

*3 See ‘GENESIS CHRONOLOGY & GENEALOGY – GREEK SEPTUAGINT – CASE #6 – PARTS 1 & 2’@ http://grebens.org

*4 Examples: 10 Commandments, Beatitudes, Holy Calendar, Psalms and Proverbs (how to manage as Kings), New Testament; writings of the Holy Fathers and the purpose for the Christian Church. Visit my other articles/blogs (http://grebens.com; http://grebems.org and 2 Books.

*5 Job 38:5-7 ‘Or who stretched the line upon it? To what were its foundations fastened, or who laid it cornerstone, when the stars were made and all My angels praised Me in a loud voice’. See also ‘CREATION MANAGEMENT LAWS - UNIQUENESS OF THE BIBLE – Definitions’ @ http://grebens.org

*6 See ‘MAN'S BRAIN'S PRIORITIZING CAPACITY - PART 3 of 5’ @http://grebens.com

*7 See ‘ALGEBRAIC VS. GEOMETRIC REALITY - Part 4 of 5’ @ http://grebens.com

*8 See GENESIS CHRONOLOGY and GENEALOGY – Greek Septuagint – Case #6 - Part 1 & 2’ @ http://grebens.org and ‘MATERIALISM / PHYSICALISM – DEFINITION - Part 2 of 6’ @ http://grebens.org

*9 It is now common to find on YouTube the information that both the French Revolution and the Bolshevik Revolutions have gone out of the way committed genocide against the Christian populations by the dozens of millions. There was no political or economic reason for doing this, it was purely ideological – Christianity is the only religion that clearly defines the outlines, activities and purposes of the Babylonian snake religion, and has stood in Babylon’s way. The World and specifically America have entered into their final end. The multiple QEs will be used until the American Dollar will be brought to nil value (possibly the end of 2012, when the price of oil will be $200.00 per barrel). American Christians will not be spared and will not see any mercy – ¾ of its Christian population can disappear within months. This happened after the Revolution in Russia. There are so many similarities between what happened in Russia during the WW1 and the Russian Revolution and what is going on in the USA (legally since 2009 – the USA has become the North American Union – not under the American Constitution). The similarities are due to having the same Internationalist Bankers financing the Freemasonic-Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, and having directed America towards its self-destruction since that time to today. The methods, organizations, personalities and methods are identical. The TSA procedures at the Airport and 'Homeland Security' demonstrate a merciless precedent - the Bolshevik prototype management planning and implementation.