MATERIALISM / PHYSICALISM – DEFINITION - Part 5 of 6 @2011

Dr. George Grebens

http://grebens.org

See also: http://WhichOnesAreScientific.com; http://grebens.com, and http://grebens.net

Update: 3 April, 2011

Original Post: 3 January, 2011

NOTE: This is the 5th of 6 presentations on ‘materialism.’ As mentioned in the 1st part, the subject of ‘materialism’ is a part of a three-part application together with ‘uniformitarianism’ and ‘the theory of evolution’ in the ‘evolution, creation, intelligent design, and hybrid’ debate. Yet, of the three, 'materialisms/physicalism' is the most cryptic and the most elusive term. In the West, everyday people, scientists, educators, judicial judges and politicians have gone through their careers and lives without ever suspecting the key component of the neo-evolutionary ‘scientific’ view is materialism. The 'Theory of Evolution' is viewed to be ‘scientific’ solely based on its link to the ideology of ‘materialism’. Materialism's association with the concept of 'science' is similar to its originators' Babylon's magician's 'science of magic,' which has no connection with how to manage an accurate knowledgebase ('conditional certainty'); and the application of DMPS tool to solve 'uncertainty' , i.e., increase accurate knowledge.

Contents:

• Materialist Concepts Reviewed
• Caravaka's Materialist Model Expanded
• Where Does the Materialist Program Really Lead
• George Orwell’s ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’ and ‘Animal Farm

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

MATERIALIST CONCEPTS REVIEWED

When reading, listening or debating materialists; as, for example, it has been a frequent event on the Russian Federation TV, we discover the existence of several ‘materialist’ notions:

1) The most dramatic interpretation and application of materialism during the past 200 years has been the materialism of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin and Mao. Having swayed billions of people around the Earth; its financiers, imperialists, its secret societies and organizations committed genocide against billions of people, while destroying non-materialist civilization.

2) There are many Marxist materialists, having witnessed the implementation of the genocidal horrific materialist ideals now offer apologetics views – that such genocidal, government prison camps, extreme totalitarianism were proof of a gross misunderstanding of the Marxist revolutionary terms and conditions. To this day such Marxist apologists try to formulate a ‘true’ version of quasi-Marxist materialism. These versions offer: a) many alternatives to Marxian materialism; b) non-political and ideological materialisms; c) point to non-Marxist 'socialism;' d) distinctions between the Trotsky, Lenin, Mao's Marxists, etc. However, quasi-Marxist materialists get lost in their Marxism's as they re-create their materialist dictionaries. It is however, important to note the original fundamental criteria of ‘materialist uniformitarianism – neo-evolutionism’.

3) There are other secular versions of ideological, social and political ‘materialisms’ – such as Fascism, Nazism, Fabianism and Americanism .Precedents used to bring about the New World Order around the world - so notoriously depicted in George Orwell's 'Nineteen Eighty Four' and 'Animal Farm'.

4) Other non-Marxist, historical ‘materialist’ views, include pantheism and multi-layered materialisms that co-exist with: polytheism, theisms, phallic worshiping cults, myth-based ritualism, animalism, hedonism and divination and demonism, etc. Examining the history of 6th century Indian and Asiatic materialism, reveal many such versions. Most of these have been describe in Parts 3 and 4 of 5.

Modern Materialism could have chosen any of the historical versions of materialisms (see #4 above) – including Buddhism, which has axiomatic positions, social, ideological, ethical, state rules, etc. Yet Modern Materialists selected a materialism from India’s history that closely resembles its Babylonian system (see Part 2 of 5) –i.e., the materialism of Caravaka (see ‘D’ on Part 3 of 5) – 6th Century B.C., which also includes the Lokayata system. Caravaka provides a prototype 'materialist' ideology and sociology, which we know today as a truely Modern Materialist model. Both Caravaka and the Modern Materialist model reflect clearly the early Babylonian financial rather than the 'scientific' model.

CARAVAKA'S MATERIALIST MODEL EXPANDED

Below is the expanded text from Caravaka's model presented in 'Materialism/Physicalism - Definition - Part 3 of 5' @ http://grebens.org:

I Axiomatic statements:

1. Religion is man’s invention and not that of some divine authority
2. Reject the view of an after-life*1
3. Everything occurs naturally through the mechanisms of nature (similar to 1st or 5 points of materialistic uniformitarianism rules) – ‘Today’s/current events, conditions, rates and processes’ (see the five rules below and in Part 1 of 5)
4. Since there is a certainty of death -
5. Indulge the senses today (like Greek ‘Epicureans’)*2

II Type of Dialectical and Reductionist methods *3

1. Four elements in the universe: earth, water, fire, air and the combination of hot and cold, being fat and lean are the same subject. This is equivalent to interplay of ‘chance’ - refer to the 3rd, and ‘simple-to-complex’ - 4th of 5 materialistic uniformitarian points - see Figure 40) (see list 11-5 below)
2. Intelligence is derived from the material four elements (II - 1.) of the universe (Note: some of Caravaka's dialectic duos lead to absurdities, e.g., "in 'I am fat", ‘I am lean’, these attributes abide in the same subject, and since fatness, reside only in the body, it alone is the soul and no other, and such phrases as 'my body' are only significant metaphorically’*4.
3. Inferences may be permitted, speculative metaphysics is to be avoided (i.e., ‘closed system’ - see the similarities with #5 in Figure 40 below).
4. Reject the 'cast system' because the human body is the same (i.e., 'simple-to-complex' #4 on Figure 40 - similar and without distinction from 'animal' bodies - e.g., primates)
5. The ‘three authors of the Vedas were buffoons, knaves, and demons’*4 This is an extention of the fifth point of the materialistic uniformitarian concept - see #5 on Figure 40.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Figure 40 -The Five Materialistic Uniformitarian Points:

1. Today’s/current events, conditions, rates and processes, and by
2. Extrapolating these to the past – to the beginning (e.g., the Big Bang) and
3. Through statistical progression ('chance')
4. Lead from the simple-to-complex or primitive-to-modernist processes
5. All accomplished within the framework of a closed system – i.e., without any participating exterior force (divine entities, God)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

The Modern Materialistic Uniformitarians follow Caravaka - who focuses on specific characteristics:

a) Its own exclusive non-mythological-based vocabulary, concepts, dictionary

b) Seeks a standard for evaluating reality – reductionism

c) Evaluates and grades the teachings and authority of mythological writers’ as being the product of ‘buffoons, knaves, and demons’ (see II-5 above). However, such an appraisals should seek objective criteria, that would help prove that either the appraiser and/or the appraised qualify under the same criteria - i.e., ‘buffoons, knaves and demons.’ In other words, how can the materialist prove that he/she/it escapes the same appraisal criteria and evaluation? For example, in the modern world, materialistic uniformitarianists, e.g., in former USSR, the Soviet Courts accused religious people of idiocy and insanity, and because of such evaluations, the religious were placed into insane asylums for treatment. Wouldn't Soviet Courts, psychiatrists and administrative managers also qualify for such verdicts since religion and ideology reflect similar frameworks (see 'Ideology's Similarities with Religion' Part 1 of 5' @ http://grebens.com? Yet, the one-sided criteria have been used in Communist controlled countries for decades, to justify genocidal programs against Christian European nations Similarly, in the USA there are 'activist Federal Judges’ (United Nations) who pass decisions that censure the ‘unscientific character’ Christian Creationists and Intelligent Design scientists*5. This includes not only activist Judges, but also Educational Systems administration*5, University Deans and Boards who reject academic tenure to highly qualified science professors who had among other things, discovered up to 12 planets*6. Decisions and legislation that had thousands lose their job and had ended their careers*6. And not to forget directives issued and implemented by legions of ideological debunkers*7 who are guided by the National Academy of Sciences ‘Science and Creationism’*8.

d) Caravaka’s ‘human rights’ statement rejects the ‘cast system’ on the basis of the similarity among human bodies (see II-4 above). The axiomatic statement, is inevitably linked a wider field of axioms that express themselves through various ‘derivatives’, e.g., the ‘hedonistic rights’ axiom (see I-5 above). Under such conditions we find hidden sub-‘cast system’ issues that are evident in today’s ‘human rights’ applications - which in spite of the original 'anti-cast system' re-introduce the division among: class, groups, age, generation, gender, etc. Expansion of such axioms inevitably leads to the justification for genocide and even cannibalism. For example, here are some examples of materialists who applied this 'body-based equality' to initiate social cleansing – i.e., ‘materialistic Jihads’: the materialist Marxists prioritizes the class purity – ‘Proletariat’ (working people) and went about committing genocide against the Bourgeoisie, Capitalists and Christians. The materialist Nazis promoted race purity (the Folk) and devalued the Slavs, Gypsies, Jews, other 'sub-humans' and Christians - those who filled concentartion camps and ranks of slave labor. The materialist Americanists who proimote an anti-Christian New World Order – has its divisional focus extending to all possible social divisions: age – particularly with Obamacare (abortion and early euthenasia of senior citizens whose health care will be too expensive, death panels; see similarities with the Nazi T4 policy – ‘Affordable Health Care for America Act’ - HR 3962)*9. Earlier notions of the 1970's: ‘do not trust anyone over 30’; distinctions among middle and upper middle class (IRS); generation gaps, gender (feminism); Intelligence Quotient (IQ); mis-education (dumbing down)*10; turning the Patriot Act against gun owners and the majority of Americans who due to their adhearance to the American Constitition and Christian principles are now viewed as insurgents against the treasonous New American Union (which unites the USA with Mexico and Canada - in 2009 and the New World Order and neutralizes the constitutional United States of America. Increasingly, there is no recognition of nationality - everyone is a potential citizen of the world, right to live anywhere (balkanization), no borders ('invasion'?). However, this internationalization of everyone, also allows the new World Masters to implement forced population displacement and relocation programs. View that no single religion can be placed above another (pluralism); no cultural standards; intellectual and creative relativism; religions is considered to be better than cultism, Satanism and myth. Since the 'material body' is the only criteria upon which equality and evaluation is established, rather than the use of cultural and ethical indices that reflect and lead to qualitative infrastructural improvement, innovation and invention; humans are inevitably compared with standards of the animal kingdom - similar to, 'evolved from' primates.

Caravaka’s axiomatic ‘Indulge the senses today’ (see I-5 above) leads to hedonism, phallic worshiping religions, degradation of the arts, sciences, which leads to the breakdown of the family unit, promotion of single parents - towards the search that satisfies one’s comfort zone, socialization of sex and abolition of marriage. Insults, deception, crime, State sponsored terrorism as a means of 'persuasion,' depopulation schemes become easy for the Internationalist Order to implement, since the neo-animal's 'mind' has been spun around relativism and doesn't have objective criteria to determine what is right and wrong.

e) Let's review: 1) since, man’s brain’s prioritizing capacity*11 forms a hierarchy of priorities. Since the highest priority, which acquires divine-like quality, that will be defended until death, whose priorities determine in-/sanity; from which all secondary priorities are de-prioritize in an organized structure, then 2) it is clear to recognize that the materialists’ highest priority must by definition, policy and implementation be identified with pantheism - the prioritization and worship of nature). See more details in 'Materialism /Physicalism - Definition - Epilog Part 6 of 6' @ http://grebens.org.

Caravaka’s approach provides an original materialist’s profile: a) an axiomatic standard, and b) an ideological and sociological program. It is also possible to identify here a materialistic-naturalist-atheistic program that is coupled with a specifically targeted anti-mythological program.

Note1: Some promote the false notion that 'materialism=science & technology; vs. 'religion=Medievalism & subjective mythology.' It should be noted that Caravaka's materialist model (India, 6th century B.C.) had NOT developed into any type nor improved level of 'science' and 'technology.' On the other hand, in Christian Europe - this is almost 2000 years later - true science (3DMM) and the scientific method (DMPS) had developed. It is in Europe - almost 2000 years after Caravaka's materialism - that Christianity created the favorable environment where true science (3DMM) and the scientific method (DMPS) had been developed. This was before materialist uniformitarianism (similar to CARAVAKA's Materialist Model) had been established. Christian Europe had established all branches of science by the 18th and 19th centuries. This was accomplished without materialist ideological derivatives such as 'reductionism', 'relativism', 'empiricism', 'subjectivism,' 'secularism,' 'behaviorism,' and others mentioned earlier in these articles/blogs.

WHERE DOES THE MATERIALIST PROGRAM REALLY LEAD?

The article entitled ‘Financier’s Total World Collectivist Dictatorial Power – A Timeline Formula’ @ http://grebens.com provides a comprehensive Timeline of the Modern Materialists’ plan, purposes and objectives. The ‘Materialist’s’ Financial Control is historically nothing more than the continuation program of the pre-Flood failed civilization results; and the post-Flood’s Babylon rationalist-based world view:

1. The early ‘snake’-focused religion, promoted by Babylon’s followers (see Part 2 of 5), across seven rises and falls throughout history to this day’s International Bankers agenda. It began to infiltrate Christendom by the 11th century AD, and has financially managed the affairs of kingdoms and states to this minute.
2. Rationalism (e.g., Descartes) and Empiricism have been the initial visible evidence in Europe that placed the networking features that would lead to Christendom’s demise by WW1 to WW3.
3. The materialistic scope that emerged from this penetrating plan is nothing more than this ‘snake’-‘rationalist’-'financial' operation that has been conducted cryptically under the radar
4. Civilizations are penetrated at the highest level and then led towards failed civilizations (e.g., 13th/14th century in West Europe - the Dark Ages, Bubonic Plague where 2/3rds of Europe's population perished).
5. Such a cryptic and cynical system doesn’t accept competition
6. Such a system needs only enough to exist and maintain a human population at controllable and self-sustainable level
7. Such population is trained to have no will or thought of its own, except what is provided by the masters.
8. The Theory of Evolution makes it clear that there are two types of evolved higher beings – a) one master race that controls the economy of all resources; and b) other human beings that are maintained like cattle, a just above level of primates to serve the first (a).
9. The higher materialist banking specie will be regarded to be ‘gods’ with its high-techno power; while the rest of the unprivileged and dumbed down neo-primates will be bred for various purposes and functions.

Perhaps George Orwell’s ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’ and ‘Animal Farm’ describe this emerging condition that will shift all power and might to the Financier’s Total World Collectivist Dictatorial Power *12.

GEORGE ORWELL'S 'NINETEEN EIGHTY FOUR' AND 'ANIMAL FARM'

The 13th/14th Centuries West European Black Death was but one event (a prototype of what is to come), in a series that was designed to bring about the Financier's Total World Collectivist Dictatorial Power. Where does George Orwell’s ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’ and ‘Animal Farm fall in this multi-century saga?

The one Christian Church that existed in the Christianized Roman Empire from the 4th century A.D. was split into two parts in 1054 A.D. - divided between Roman Catholicism and Orthodox Christianity over the Filioque issue*13.

While Roman Catholicism was led to see a 'Reformation' and Protestant movement break away from its religious authority between the 13th and 15th centuries; the Orthodox Constantinople (Byzantine) Empire began to fall under the Internationalist Bankers influence between the 11th century A.D., and its final defeated by the Moslems in 1454 A.D. Russia took up the Christian Byzantine tradition until it too fell under the Bankers': a) Free Masonic dominated West European policies (World War 1); b) the USA's succumbing to the 'Internationalist' Federal Reserve; and the c) financially directed Bolshevik Revolution in 1917.

The last points on the Internationalist Banking Agenda was: d) launching of WW2; e) establish the United Nation Organization, whose Charter reflects international socialist principles, to which all nations had to subscribe (sign); f) promotion of perpetual wars in the developing nations (Third World); g) bank controlled socialization of West Europe (e.g., Eurozone); h) downfall of the Soviet Block under the International Banking control; i) bankruptcy of the USA with world austerity programs; and j) World War 3.

It is at this point that George Orwell's 1984 and Animal Farm become meaningful. America has dramatically changed in the past two years in preparation for the Orwellian Fascist world. American stimulus money (in the trillions) bought off the media, communications, all industries - manufacturing, agriculture, food production; the creation of a Banker's security force (e.g., TSA with its: microwaving security control and its sexually oriented practices at Airports, Bus stations, highways (reflecting a Babylonian phallic-worshiping religion); Homeland Security with its FEMA Camps; Nazi T4 medical plan with death panels; massive depopulation schemes - Carbon Emissions Tax, Copenhagen Summit with its 80% human genocide option, etc.)

We read that 1984 is set in the middle of WW3 - three geographic areas that are under a war condition. Everything is government centralized (Big Brother), and food, products are rationed - total austerity. Being under total surveillance (teleaudioscreens in every nook and cranny) is one thing, but the 500-word vocabulary and thinking (Newspeak, doublethink) imposes increasingly an internal barrier, and leads to dialectically meaningless: 'war is peace,' 'love is brainwashing, torture and hate,' 'freedom is slavery.'

This collapsed civilization creates relative environments where a new level of reality emerges: a sado-masochistic relationship among people and specifically with the Big Brother and his 'Homeland Security' environment.

The only way that any of the brainwashed serfs can survive is by wholeheartedly embracing the idea that Big Brother is the 'benevolent' (demonic) benefactor /terrorist, while you are the faulty, yet redeemable through prescribed brainwashing in becoming a more refined masochist - a subservient proletariat/worker. Among other responsibilities, you become a more refined citizen when you report on everyone (see above Homeland Security, who provide you with a phone for reporting).

Another reality emerges: the road to the past is not only blurred but rendered irreversible. Orwellian existence has a built in system erases all standards by which one may compare conditions in the past with those of the Orwellian present. Suddenly, Figure 40 -'The Five Materialistic Uniformitarian Points' acquire a new texture of 'realism' - a new standard for determining what constitutes: normalcy, existence; as well as, for determining what is: absurdity, irrelevance, stupidity, criminality. Let's review the 5 standard points of Materialisting Uniformitarianism/Neo Evolutionism:

1. Today’s/current events, conditions, rates and processes, and by
2. Synthetically, extrapolating these to the past – to the edited beginning
3. Through statistical progression ('chance') - i.e., casino gambling, i.e., relative Party direction
4. Lead from the simple-to-complex or primitive-to-modernist processes
5. All accomplished within the framework of a closed system – i.e., without any participating exterior force (divine entities, God) -

The more we follow this 5-fold path - the more we remove ourselves from the primitive and hazardous past (anarchistic freedom/license, without the homeland security) and move into a collectivist brotherhood guided by Big Brother/Sister - into the real utopian present.

Clearly, the materialist uniformitarians /evolutionists have had an advanced preparatory training and mindset for the Orwellian sado-masochistic life style. They:

a) Have been sifted for purity of 'evolutionary' superior vs. inferior positions

b) Positioned themselves within the amnesiac approach to the 'simple' 'primitive' past - thus having reduced the 3DMM to a truncated 'simpler' 2DMM that has rendered all Executive functions invisible

c) And by this, they daily brainwash themselves into a zombie state while remaining in a pure and perpetual condition of 'uncertainty' allowing yourself to be guided into a pseudo-utopia (fool's paradise) by Big Borther (see 'Science & the Scientific Method - Definition - Zombiism' @ http://grebens.org).

The EPILOG for this series of articles appears separately 'MATERIALISM / PHYSICALISM – DEFINITION - EPILOG - Part 6 of 6' @ http://grebens.org

References ----------------------------------------------

*1 Potter, Karl H., ‘The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies: Buddhist philosophy from 350 to 600 A.D’ Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publications, 2007, p 188.

*2 Potter, Karl H., ‘The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies: Buddhist Philosophy from 350 to 600 A.D.,’ Motilal Banarsidass Publications, Delhi, 2007.

*3 Nambiar, Sita Krishna,‘Prabodhacandrodaya of Krsna Misra,’ Motilal Banarasidass, Delhi, 1971.

*4 Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya (ed.), Carvaka/Lokayata, ‘An Anthology of Source Materials and Some Recent Studies,’ Indian Council of Philosophical Research, New Delhi, 1990. See also 'Scientificism and Catholicism' @ http://grebens.com where scientificists attempt to adapt the concept of 'metaphysics' to meet their own purposes, yet fail because of the paradoxical limitations of the definitions.

*5 Supreme Court rule in Epperson vs. Arkansas case (393 U.S. 97 - 1968) invalidating laws that prohibited the teaching of evolution in the classroom - issue of Establishment Clause; Edwards vs. Aguillard (482 U.S. 578 - 1987) Louisiana - ruling that invalidated laws that required equal time for teaching creationism and evolution; McLean vs. Arkansas Board of Education, 529 F. Supp. 1255, US District Court, 1982 - Establishment Clause; Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District (Case #04cv2688) - Federal Court ruled that Intelligent Design is not appropriate for inclusion in science classrooms and is essentially religious in nature, Selman vs., Cobb Country School District (2005, Georgia) - disclaimers stickers to be placed into biology books that stated that evolution was only a theory and not a fact, was ruled by Federal Distrinct Judge Clarence Cooper to be unconstitutional and in violation of the Establishment Clause of the US Constitution.

See also: 'Court Decisions on What is 'Scientific' - Case #5 @http://grebens.org. Also: 'National Academy of Sciences' 'Rule Book' - Case #2' @ http://grebens.org. Also: 'National Academy of Sciences' 'Rule Book' - Case #2' @ http://grebens.org. Also: 'Ideology's Similarities with Religion - Part 1 of 5' @ http://grebens.com. Also: 'Scientists - Professional and Ideological' @ http://grebens.com.

*6 A partial example of this reality can be seen described in ‘Expelled: No Intelligent Allowed’ starring' Ben Stein, 2008

*7 A classic example among many: Henke, K.R., Young-Earth creationist Helium Diffusion “dates” (March 17, 2005 at http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/zircons.html; Henke, K.R. “young-earth creationist helium diffusion “dates” (November 24, 2005) http://www.,talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/zirocons.html; and rebuttal by Dr. Russell Humphreys, http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/original.html; http://www.trueorigin.org/helium01.asp ; and http://www.trueorigin.org/helium02.asp . Written debate on www.trueorigin.org between Douglas Theobald (evolutionist) who presented his “29 Evidences for Macroevolution”, and Ashby Camp (creationist) who responded to fallacies presented in Theobald’s work. Mark Isaak’s “Problem with a Global Flood,” Second Edition, The Talk Origins Archive, November 16, 1998 – http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-noahs-ark.html ; and the rebuttal by J. Sarfati, “Problems with a Global Flood?”1998, http://www.trueorigin.org/arkdefend.asp

*8 http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=6024; See also: ‘National Academy of Science Version 1’ Rule Book – Case #2’ @ http:// grebens.org; ‘Court Decisions on What is Scientific – Case #5’ @ http:// grebens.org; ‘Purpose of Scientific Models is to help Interpret Empirical Data, Make predictions and Determine Which Scientific Model is Better ’ @ http:// WhichOnesAreScientific.com; and other.

*9 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama_health_care_plan_of_2009

*10 Thomson Iserbyt, Charlotte, ‘The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America - A Chronological Paper Trail,’ Conscious Press, Ravenna Press, Ohio, 1999

*11 'Man's Brain's Prioritizing Capacity - Part 3 of 5' @http://grebens.com

*12 ‘Financier’s Total World Collectivist Dictatorial Power – A Timeline Formula’ @ http://grebens.com

*13 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filioque