MATERIALISM / PHYSICALISM – DEFINITION - EPILOG - Part 6 of 6 @2011

Dr. George Grebens

http://grebens.org

See also: http://WhichOnesAreScientific.com; http://grebens.com, and http://grebens.net

Update: 29 April, 2011

Original Post: 24 April, 2011

Having completed the article ‘MATERIALISM / PHYSICALISM – DEFINITION - Part 5 of 5 @ http://grebens.org’ it soon became evident that there was more to the subject. In Part 1 of 5 Materialism in Europe had an early historical beginning with positivism. This is what the dictionary definition reflects – a philosophical and ideological content. A longer historical view shows that in India materialism was associated with: a) axiomatic positions; b) proper rules-based behavior (e.g., Buddha); and c) sociological/ideological prescriptions: anti-religion/spiritualism; aspirations towards the lowest common denominator – e.g., perception of similarities among all human bodies, and peripheral similarities with animals (later developed into an evolutionary common ancestry, and link to primates); sensualist priorities; versions of dialectics (see Caravaka's views). This, in many ways, anticipated the modern materialists; d) the Early Greeks perceived atomism, molecularism (Democritus), and even a Genesis physical process without the Creator (see Figure 44).

At the end of article Part 5 of 5 there remained a lingering question about Materialism – what is materialism as a tool? What was it designed for? A tool is used to increase power, refine movement, perception and measurement of dimensions – at macro and micro levels, refine processes, specify, organize, diversify, coordinate, filter, etc. Intellectual and social tools include not only philosophies, ideologies, organizations, finance and management, but tools are designed to achieve specific, approximate, general, analytical results. Inevitably, we need to identify who uses such tools for what ends (purposes). Not all tools are scientific, i.e., part of a process that leads to 'accurate knowledge' - to achieve ‘conditional certainty;’ or used as a scientific method, which is used to convert ‘uncertainty’ to ‘conditional certainty’). In the case where some claim that materialism is equivalent to being scientific or implies that it is the scientific method (e.g., Marxism's 'dialectical materialism') this can only be conceived when the terms are defined within the materialistic scope (dictionary) and not outside of it.

A distinction should be made between ‘matter’ and ‘Materialism’. Materialism / Physicalism is not something that refers to an independent, objective reality. It is a synthetic view interpreted through the senses, information and programming flows, filtered and reconstituted as ‘reality’. At the same time Materialists cannot monopolize ‘matter’ since every ideology has addressed, defined and prioritized issues of matter - see article entitled – ‘The Econo-Mythological Vehicle’ @ http://grebens.org.

‘Materialism’ therefore, being an ideology, it also: a) has a view on ‘matter’; b) is used as a tool; and c) has a ‘mythology’ that specifically can be seen in its ideologically defined pseudo-scientific notions of: reductionism, relativism, algebraic rule-based operations, ‘luxury-syndrome,’ categorical subjective atheism, anti-religion, which later will specifically reflect a supremacist approach.

DESIGN AND OPERATION OF TOOLS

INTRODUCTION

Management principles help uncover the tool’s design and function. Management must address plans, functions, executive and supervisory functions, infrastructures. Knowledge must be refined, tested for accuracy to help remove ‘uncertainty.’ Its accuracy is stored in a knowledgebase that must be managed and in this book/articles/blogs I identify as the 3-Dimensional Management Model (3DMM) (see Figure 5 above). This is the best design that helps account for all management plans, infrastructures, rows, columns and functions as a network. This in turn allows for the identification and establishment of the 2-Dimensional Management Model (2DMM) (see Figure 45), which the materialists define by including the concepts and applications of: reductionism, relativism, empiricism, subjectivism, secularism, behaviorism, algebraic rule-based operations, ‘luxury-syndrome,’ atheism, anti-religion, modernism – and specifically reflect an almost invisible supremacist approach (see below).

Coupled with these ‘materialist’ axiomatic and procedural inclusions, they also identify the generic notion of ‘uniformitarianism’ – another quasi-scientific application:

Figure 40 -The Five Materialistic Uniformitarian Points:

1. Start by taking today’s/current events, conditions, rates and processes, and by
2. Extrapolating these to the past – to the beginning (e.g., the Big Bang, Steady State) and
3. Through statistical progression ('chance')
4. Lead through the simple-to-complex or primitive-to-modernist processes
5. That must be accomplished within the framework of a closed system – i.e., without any participating exterior force (e.g., divine entities, God)

Materialism’s foundational management structure – i.e., 2DMM (see Figure 45) lies not only at the foundation of the neo-evolutionary view, which today is supposed to be applied to biology only, but also to: sociology, politics, psychology, behaviorism, history, etc. When we compare 2DMM with 3DMM, it is evident that the materialists’ ideological limitations have truncated the 3DMM in a significant way. Instead of three infrastructures (management design, operations and style), the materialists’ 2DMM has only two infrastructures: management design and operation. The materialist has totally eliminated the 1) third infrastructure – management style with its nine plans: Ethics, Self-Image, Culture, Mgt Method, Attitude, Habit, and Quality/Linear; Dignity, Integrity, Self-Determination, and Dependence /Growth.

Furthermore, see Figure 45 above, the materialists have also removed / truncated / reduced two additional features of the 3DMM - the: Executive row from the remaining two infrastructures: 2) Management Design and 3) Management Operations. In Management Design (2) it removed its Executive plans: Planning, Organizing, Directing and Purpose, Objectives, and Strategy – a total of 6 Executive plans and in Management Operations (3) its Executive level plans: Planning, Organizing, and Directing.

The Materialists substitute these Executive plans and the Style Infrastructural areas by plans on the remaining approved Design and Operations Supervisory and Functional rows: Management Operations - Supervisory row - the plans: Leading [O4], Controlling [O5], and Implementing [O6]; on the Functional row: Optimizing [O7] Financial [O8], and Quality Control [O9] and on the Management Design - Supervisory row - the plans: Policy [D4], Procedures [D5], and Rules & Regulations [D6]; on the Functional row: R&D [D7] Economics [D8], and Productivity [D9].

So subjects such as: sociology, politics, psychology, behaviorism, history, etc. will only appear within the context of these 2DMM's 12 plans on two infrastructures, and would not include the Management Style or the Executive rows on two infrastructures. In these cases, both Management Style and Executive plans will be substituted and redefined in terms of the 2DMM 12 plans on two infrastructures.

For example, day to day activities, the media will broadcast, education will instruct, and the 'evolved' human psychology can only be presented within the context of the limited 2DMM's 12 plans at two infrastructures. These were ideologically defined for the ‘proletariat’ – the humanoid that 'evolved' from primates.

The higher fuller deck that exists within the 3DMM, i.e., Management Style, and the Executive plans on the Management Design and Operation are reserved, for example, for the ‘Dictatorship of the Proletariat' and the 'ruling internationalist Banker elite.' The humanoids (proletariat) are barred from these Executive areas at the pain of death. The Theory of Evolution and its infrastructural Materialist Ideology *1 are specifically designed to help maintain this truncated status quo, whose objective among many others is to eliminate Christianity. Specifically, because Christianity talks about man-is-made-in-the-image-of-God*2, contains an alternate legal history that begins with Creation *3 and continues to the New Testament; and the scriptures (Christian Bible) that contains the plan for man’s and society's self-perfection*4.

APPLICATION OF 3DMM

The Christian Bible's 3DMM is used here as a source that helps contrast the Materialist 2DMM. This contrasting value is recognized by the Materialists themselves. Specifically, the original Christian Bible’s 3DMM does not recognize the Materialists’ Ideological axioms*1 and its serious management limitations 2DMM.

In my previous publications, I spent much time in describing the 3DMM Management Design infrastructure, which provides the fundamental ‘body’ structure upon which other Infrastructures are networked. In this case, because Materialists eliminate the Management Style infrastructure, it is therefore necessary to clarify what Materialists object to.

The Management Style infrastructure within the 3DMM begins in the Executive row and in the directive column i.e.,with Ethics (S1). World literature abounds with speculations and teachings on ethics, however, the 3DMM begins by establishing the Executive Row with fundamental principles – specifically:

a) Geometric natural law, geometric solids, the inheritance principle and with qualitative/infrastructural energy flux density, which lie at the foundation of all that is divinely Created*5

b) Distinguishes between alternate orientations of purpose – the ‘Tree of Life’ or ‘Tree of the Knowledge of Good & Evil’ (death). This is not only the enactment of free will – decision-making and problem-solving (see D4 on the Management Design level) but also assignment of an Executive Function. In other words, instead of following the true perfect will of the Eternal Lord God, as angels do, man is given an opportunity to accept another alternative – i.e., follow his own less than perfect alternatives – thus assign his own priorities and becoming a ‘god’ unto himself*6. Note: the alternate view to geometric natural law, geometric solids, and qualitative/infrastructural energy flux density (i.e., ‘a’), is the algebraic subjective relative rules-based (not laws) approach*7.

c) This choice distinctions place man in correspondingly different relationships with the Eternal Lord God. By following God’s creative Will places man in a family-son/daughter relationship with the Eternal Lord God. The contrarian alternate choice places man in a competitor, opponent (e.g., the true definition of ‘opponent’ is ‘satanic’) position to the Eternal Lord God. Adam and Eve have been escorted out of the executive Garden of Eden (executive boardroom), into the outer domain where now they could suffer the consequences of their imperfect choice: pain, labor, suffering and fragmentation – the less perfect world.

d) The implementation of either decision automatically changes the outcome of Creation. The first choice – cooperation with perfection would lead to the fruits of the Tree of Life – Adam and Eve would have become spiritual beings – as Jesus Christ after the Resurrection. This state would lead to everlasting perfect and delightful creations in Eternity. The second outcome would lead not only to the drop of all Creation down one cycle on the qualitative/infrastructural energy flux density, but would introduce death, a qualitative energy flux drop on the infrastructures and live cycles. This has become evident not only in the singularities: 2nd, 3rd (hydro-tectonic Flood), but also in ever finding the perfect tools and solutions that existed before the 2nd and 3rd singularities, that would have helped arrest degradation in the inner and exterior environments. Temporary improvements can be achieved when under favorable conditions civilizations improve accurate knowledge (science) and use of proper scientific methods (use tools to overcome ‘uncertainty’). But in a universal drop of energy flux density, such perfect tools degrade together with the universe.

Let us look at another example: With the introduction of the 2nd singularity – the choice of the imperfect executive choice; and 2262 years later with the consequences that led to the 3rd singularity (the hydro-tectonic Flood), there occurred a dramatic deterioration of the perfect man and his descendants. The freedom of choice also affected the integrity of man’s structural condition. To describe this simply, Man’s mind, emotions and body evidenced a network breakdown and fragmentation. Man’s Supervisory plans (psyche, soul faculties) separated/broke with man’s Executive plans (purpose, objectives, strategy, ethics, self-image, culture, etc.); while the Functional plans (body, processes, productivity, etc.) disorganized themselves from the first two [executive (spirit) and supervisory (soul/psyche functions). The Eternal Lord God took a calculated risk in creating man with free choice - decision-making and problem solving (D4). All was done due to the freedom given. Man became a sick entity that needed perpetual self-reparation (repentance). The Russian Orthodox Church is perhaps the only entity left that still recognizes this dilemma and the road to a solution. Jesus Christ is the Eternal Lord God of the Christian Old Testament that was born in an Adamic original perfect form (5 B.C. or 5417 Year from Creation (YFC) to close the loop and re-introduce the solution - i.e., the Tree of Life – now the Resurrection and change is the means that saves mankind form the pre-destined eternal death verdict.

Residing under the conditions of the 2nd and 3rd singularities, no man, religion, organization, international banking associates would ever be able to remove death from our existential equation. Some may theorize about some reparations at the info-nano-high-tech sub-chromosomal level, or transfer man’s ‘essence’ to some cyborg configuration? The bankers who would afford such transmigrations forget that they don’t have the original 3DMM key before it disintegration during the 2nd singularity. What about matter-energy-time that underwent dramatic energy-flux reduction by at least one cycle down the energy flux density throughout the universe? Today, the economics of matter-energy-time and a few other components are in a non-reversible state and condition. The tools and processes that would be attempted in this cosmic reparation have also been irreversibly degraded.

APPLICATION OF 2DMM

The above discussion simply addressed some aspects of Ethics (S1) in the 3DMM’s Management Style infrastructure that is not addressed, is eliminated (reduced, relativized) from the 3DMM due to the 2DMM’s materialistic ideological axioms*1.

How do the everyday materialists and their elite managers address this Ethics (S1) issue on their truncated 2DMM? For the everyday materialist the elite managers simply substitute and redefine Ethics in terms of what exists within the plans at two infrastructures - the 12 plans within the 2DMM. In this case [Ethics (S1)] is substituted by the Supervisory row - located at the Management Design 'Policy' (D4)

The elite materialist dictatorship manages on the Management Design Executive level: 'Purpose (D1); 'Objectives' (D2) and 'Strategies' (D3) and these results are converted into Policies (D4) for implementation throughout the Supervisory and the Functional rows, at the Management Design and Management Operational levels - a total of 12 plans (D4-D9 and (O4-O9).

Once Policy (D4) - i.e., Guidelines for Decision-Making and Problem-Solving results have been coded for the Administrative, Operational, Maintenance, Safety, Security, Emergency implementation, this implementation is further refined via Procedures (D5) and Rules & Regulations (D6). This then formulates the scope of the 2DMM 'Ethics'.

The rank-and-file materialist may or may not suspect where such 'Ethics parameters' emerge. Yet, the elite bankers' associates secretly control the Executive row's Purpose [D5], Objectives [D2], and Strategies [D3] to help create, introduce and implement any 'Luxury Syndrome' and 'Zombiist' directives that they wish (see 'Science & the Scientific Method - Parts 1, 2, 3' @http://grebens.org). Coupling these with advanced 'marketing', the 'Ministry of Truth' (Orwellian) controlled media promotions and enforcement. In this way, the elite can direct the rank-and-file materialist towards any initiative, towards higher productivity quotas, suicidal and terrorist missions, to commit grand genocide (e.g., Bolsheviks), perform pseudo-science [Policy (D4)] i.e., 'Luxury Syndrome' & Zombiism (see above reference) ; and publically promote it as a scientific method, guideline, and through rabid debunking methods by using the 'National Academy of Sciences' Rule Book - Case #2' @http://grebens.org).

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

[S2] Self-Image on the 3DMM procedurally follows Ethics [S1]. We find why the 2DMM rejects this Management Style plan, since Self-Image (S2) reflects the Genesis described perfect option of a perfect integrity of man/woman, who potentially could have followed their way to the Tree of Life - becoming sons/daughters of God. Whereas, their choice of the fruit of the 'Tree of Good and Evil': left them broken, fragmented, sick and dying; b) searching for something to cover their nakedness and handicap by any means - whether in the beginning with fig leaves or later to cover their illogical, insensitive and defective and illegal thinking; or later (their descendants) for evident abnormalities, social incoherence, subject to and generating propaganda, and deception . Seek camouflage, find means to re-direct possible unwanted results and counter effects, or resorting to threat, etc. to produce some kind of self-image that is acceptable in the environment where they live and influence; and c) hide from righteous authority.

On the other hand, those who wish to resolve/heal their sick conditions will ‘repent’ – find every mean to re-examine their fragmented (sinful, law-violating) condition and find God’s support and means (e.g., prayer, fasting, restitution, adhere to the 10 commandments, beatitudes, etc.). They will make a lifelong effort to correct the fragmented networks (personal, social, cultural); including the fragmentation inherited from ancestors or as results of mixed marriages with outsiders or heathens (see 2nd Commandment).

To substitute Self-Image [S2] challenges on the 2DMM, 'materialists' and potential materialist converts are directed to the 2DMM's lower infrastructural plans. These are located at the Management Design level that include: Policy [D4] – where they use a camouflaged Zombiist quasi-'self-image' views to decision-making and problem-solving; Procedures [D5] - which are derived from Policy, offer an over/simplified flowchart of behavior (reductionism); Rules & Regulations [D6] – identify specific do's & don'ts  - compliance, righteous looking rituals and behavior; Research & Development [D7] – distorted etiquette, surface acceptable/promoted behavior, fashion; Economics [D8] – expense to form impression, competitive attraction, expressive leadership; Productivity [D9] – favorable customer relations, meet what is understood to be a new orientation of 'customer needs', satisfaction, delight. Such Management Design level Self-Image is designed either to get satisfaction, to project a superior competitive image based on a few rather than integral features; or through compliance, threat or bluff. This is where we identify unadulterated hypocrisy.

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

[S3] Culture which procedureally follows Ethics [S1] and specifically Self-Image [S2] on the Management Style’s 3DMM's infrastructure is aimed to establish a full 'communion of saints'. One of the best attempts to establishing geometrically natural law-based societies had been that of the formation of the United States of America. Americans at that time clearly recognized their colonially degrading situation; what they were fighting against and what they stood for. They recognized the non-monetarist-Imperial-colonial civilization/cultural establishment. Yet they established a true alternative and positive cultural model. The Fathers of the American War of Independence recognized that Apostolic Christianity contained the geometric natural laws, and this is why they promoted Christian ideals that are evident in everything they had promoted. The Freemasonic element was diverted from Babylonian version to that represented by the ideals of the Society of Cincinnatus – that also offered a geometrical natural law-based option - the Repulic. This option allowed man to self-perfect himself and society by discovering new qualitative (infrastructural) laws of physical economy and interrelations that dramatically increased innovation, technoloical development, a banking system based on credit rather than the destructive and colonial Monetarist Systeml This credit-based banking system was later re-introduced as the Glass Steagall Act (1993) that protected American Banking during a deep depression launched by the Monetarists (Federal Reserve, Taxation, Wall-Street, British Imperialism). The Fathers recognized the dignity, integrity, self-determination and protection of the Crhistian family which became the nucleus of this new booming culture.

The substitutefor Self-Image [S2] on the 2DMM – is also located on lower infrastructural plans on the Management Design and Operational levels where we find the notion of 'collectivism.' This is also established by the elite that directs: Policy [D4] - effective and pre-set decision-making and problem-solving via the 'Luxury Syndrome' which leads to 'Zombiism' (see 'Science and the Scientific Method - Definitions - Zombiism' @ http://grebens.org); to Procedures [D5] - the most simplified economical flowcharted steps, to behavior conditioning; to the Rules & Regulations [D6] plan, which is equivalent to 'emotions' on the psychological plan (see Figure 5 and Table 3 in my blogs and Books). We have proactive conditioning coupled with compliance, public events and regulated behavior with its purposes of submission (e.g., TSA groping). The Research & Development [D7] plan - ensures proper respect for the right authority, training for compliance, neutralization of 'alien' 3DMM-derived behavior, pervasive awareness of surveillance, ethical and racial relativism, language and thought control, set of taboos, media control. The Economics [D8] plan – no private property, all belongs to the 'Dictatorship of the Proletariat,' serfdom, quotas. The Productivity [D9] plan – statistically measured productivity, housing regulation, family under social management. Such Management Design level of 2DMM 'Culture' is designed to ensure total population and resource control under threat reflects a dedication to State security rather than individual or family security.

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

A similar approach is evident for all the remaining  Management Style plans.

[S4] – Management Method within the 3DMM - let's summarize:  the plan Management Method implements its Executive plans: Ethics (S1) , Self-image (S2), Culture (S3) and thus the Management Method reflects, conducts and implements within the basic principles of: geometric natural law, geometric solids and the infrastructured energy flux density. Management Method functions are designed to serve the short and long-term improvements of the citizen, society and culture; and to the infrastructure – economic, technological, and educational.

On the other hand, 2DMM – management is established on algebraic relative rules. Is essentially authoritarian – distinguishes between the State which is ‘above the law’ and the legally underprivileged serfs, who have no rights. Rules (not laws) are continuously implemented to reduce the population’s dignity, and lead towards immanent serfdom. Example: the TSA Airport Scanners (microwaves are set at up to 99 times over the safe limits) dangerous to humans, and pervasive pat-downs with unhygienic gloves (from person to person)are essentially sexual harrassment, insults, molestation and abuse. Is such ‘inspection’ used to identify terrorists (Al-Qaida), or is it an ideologically-alien government terrorist operation that trains the population for the status of unprivileged serfs. The State promotes un-Christian management and behavior.

Over the years, the State judicially and unconstitutionally has been removing all moral and public Christian indicators – 10 Commandments, Prayer in School, limits Christian activity through Tax codes, and at the same time, legalizing phallic religious practices (TSA); redefines marriage, promotes anti-Christian religions/ideologies (this includes Neo-Evolution); legislating Hate-Crime Laws 'pre-thought crimes' exclusively aimed at shutting down the population's majority – the Christian population – evidence of galloping secularization and collectivization. All of these are secret International Banker policies that had been so evident since Babylon 1 from 2840 B.C.*8

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

[S5] – Attitude: 3DMM & 2DMM When an aircraft is about to land, it’s behavior in the air before it is about to land, will reveal its ‘attitude’ – behavior on whether or how it will reach its objective (landing). Similarly, the Attitude (S5) can help determine – through verbal, behavioral or ‘non-verbal communication’ which objective will be reached.

On the 3DMM Attitude [S5] holds a central position on the 3DMM’s Management Style infrastructure. Needless to say, the 2DMM is removed together with the Management Style on which Attitude exists. 2DMM substitutes Attitude [S5] by Procedures [D5] on the Management Design infrastructure (see Figure 45).

Attitude [S5] on the Management Style (3DMM) not only reflects what is going on and the condition in the surrounding plans i.e., on both the Management Style and below, on the Management Operations infrastructures), but also affects these plans in various ways by adjusting itself to past and existing conditions. Yes, Attitude provides predictable results – we can forecast how and where 'it' will land. The Attitude of people, organizations, societies, governments and cultures reflect the intent and source of the intent revealing the type of Executive and Functional infrastructures, as well as the type of column Directive and Info-base plans exist. The above paragraphs provide enough information about the Executive plans to help us predict and interpret the Attitudes [S5] in 3DMM and 2DMM environments.

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

[S6] – Habits are based on repeated and/or learned patterns of experience of behavior within the various plans on various infrastructures. There may be many similar habits (patterns of behavior) but there are enough potential variations that reveal the differences between cultural 3DMM and 2DMM differences. What is important is to distinguish between one or two types of similar behaviors, is to identify one or a series of behaviors that reflect differences among three infrastructures – e.g., the central plans – Procedures [D5], Controlling [O5] and Attitude [S5), or Ethics (S1), Planning [O5] and Purpose [D1], or Economics [D8], Finance [O8] and Dignity, Integrity and Self Determination [S8]. In some cases the materialist who uses 2DMM won't realize that there are links among some plans and infrastrucdrures that do not appear on the 2DMM - they are invisible - e.g., see Figure 45 - the links: Purpose (D1); Organizing (02) and Culture (S3). All of these are in the Executive and Stylistic areas.

It is also here, that we can distinguish the difference between the Republic and a Democracy. There is a dramatic if not a suicidal difference that most people don’t recognize. Sometimes, two systems may be similar on the surface, but their behavioral habits and what they prioritize are totally different. Proportionately to its population and industry, a large hierarchal government usually reflects habits of vulnerability and an obsession for security; while a small government feels protected by its people. A secularist government will be obsessed by the threat of a Christian population, while a Republic (based on geometric natural law) considers a Christian population a blessing. These repeatable habits are common throughout history.

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

[S7] – Quality/Linear – As it has been shown above the 3DMM which includes the Management Style also includes Geometric Natural Law, Geometric Solids, the inheritance principle, Energy Flux Density and also the Management Change Principles. Inevitably, due to the Materialist Ideological axioms, its approach shows not only a subtraction of infrastructures and executive plans, but also a repeated linearity at infrastructural changes (see Figure 16 - Study of Qualitative Change Types' also below).

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

[S8] – Dignity/Integrity/Self-Determination – The 3DMM when properly constructed, maintained and updated inevitably reflects dignity, integrity and self-determination within geometrical natural law, while the 2DMM provides evidence for the violation of dignity, integrity and self-determination. This is because of the materialists' manipulated infrastructures, plans, rows, and columnar plans.

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

[S9] – Dependence or Growth – The 3DMM contains an open system that is constantly updatable – ensuring verified and accurate knowledge in its 3DMM – this balanced and sustainable growth. While due to ideological limitations the materialist uniformitarian 2DMM is constrained to have all plans to be highly regulated by those who manage the executive plans and the management style infrastrudcture - thus 'dependence.'

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

Figure 16 – Study of Qualitative Change Types

Before concluding, it may be worthwhile to include a brief study of Figure 5 - Qualitative (infrastructural) Change Management. Based on Billions of Dollars of project management experience in various industries, we can clearly see a difference among four to five levels of qualitative change management. This should help answer a few definitions and concepts in the debate – Evolution, Creation, Intelligent Design, Hybrids.

In Figure 5 we can clearly show the differences among the four to five levels of qualitative change. Facilities, Plants, Process Engineering can clearly help define at least its 4 levels of change in a workable way: 1. Copy; 2. Change, adaptation, micro-change; 3) Improvement, re-engineering, macro-change; 4) Innovation, re-design, mega-change; and 5) Invention, breakthrough, conscious self-change. Neo-Evolution scientists can only theorize up to the 2nd level of management change and then linearly repeat the same process environmental stress, statistical randomness - chance) to account for all higher qualitatitive/ infrastructural changes (see ‘NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENTISTS’ RULE BOOK,’ @ http://grebens org; also ‘SCIENCE AND THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD 1, 2, 3’ @ http://grebens org; also ‘LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE AND THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD 1- 12’ @ WhichOnesAreScientific.com.

------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------

CONCLUSION

It is now clear that besides posing as a ‘scientific tool’ of true reality, Materialism clearly is a tool designed to help achieve other purposes.  Materialism as a tool is used to reduce all religions and civilizations and is not designed to prove true scientific evidence. In fact, many have known, or now begin to awaken to the reality that Materialism is:

1. Not designed to pursue the scientific ‘conditional certainty,’ but to ensure the continuity of ‘uncertainty’
2. To reduce all ideologies/religions and civilizations with the help of Freemasonry, Babylonianism, Fascism, Bolshevism, Communism, and Modernism - who adhere the materialist uniformitarian matrix
3. And after having reduced all ideologies/religions and civilizations to then promote and ensure the global ‘snake’/Babylonian alternative only – see Part 2 of 6 in this series of articles.
4. A tool that is used to destroy non-Babylonian mythologies and civilizations and specifically aimed at Christendom that has originated from the Biblical Patriarchs*9.
5. To have its adherents subjected to a truncated thinking management process that renders them into robotons, serfs, proletariat who mindlessly will fulfill all that the invisible ‘superior’ group of associates direct them to do. The 2DMM is specifically designed for this purpose. George Orwell’s ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’ has perhaps provided the best representative blueprint for this sinister end.
6. A supremacist tool since it is used to ensure the final success of the Babylonian religion*8

The Materialist Tool is destructive in every way. It is not even a tool to help support itself (materialism).It is a means to an end. Instead of having the materialist tool help resolve ‘uncertainty,’ it is, instead, used not only to geometrically promote and ensure the continuation of ‘uncertainty,’ but also to neutralize ‘conditional certainty.’ The materialist tool is designed to confront the ‘conditional certainty’s knowledgebase through: relativism, reductionism and behavioral conditioning to forget the past (self-brainwashing) rendering them into Orwellian enslaved amnesiacs. The last century’s practical aspects of science and technology have been used to simply enslave the serfs, proletariat, and democratic peoples under increasing totalitarianism (e.g., dictatorship of the programmed proletariat).

This has become particularly evident from the 2008 World Financial Derivative fiasco. Now there is no safe haven anywhere on Earth. As a tool, Materialism is used to distinguish between: a) the manipulating controllers - those who secretly use the economic (materialistic) means for self-interest; and b) against the increasingly quantitatively diminishing people, groups, societies, nations, and civilizations that must serve the purposes of the first (‘a’).

Paradoxically, Materialism has not been used ‘scientifically’ to establish futuristic utopias; instead this tool is destructive, dehumanizing, it helps to achieve never ending genocidal ends. This materialistic tool is used to distinguish between its users and the users’ managers – who now have successfully stolen all of the Earth’s assets, and reflect the image of the ancient capricious pagan gods.

Happy Easter!

References---------------------------------

*1 Materialist ideology includes axioms of: reductionism, relativism, empiricism, subjectivism, secularism, behaviorism, algebraic rule-based operations, ‘luxury-syndrome,’ atheism, anti-religion, modernism – and specifically reflect an almost invisible supremacist approach. Coupled with ‘materialism’ we inevitably identify the generic notion of ‘uniformitarianism’ – another quasi-scientific application:

Figure 40 -The Five Materialistic Uniformitarian Points:

1. Today’s/current events, conditions, rates and processes, and by
2. Extrapolating these to the past – to the beginning (e.g., the Big Bang) and
3. Through statistical progression ('chance')
4. Lead from the simple-to-complex or primitive-to-modernist processes
5. All accomplished within the framework of a closed system – i.e., without any participating exterior force (divine entities, God)

*2 Genesis 1:27 “So God made man: in the image of God He made them.’

*3 See ‘GENESIS CHRONOLOGY & GENEALOGY – GREEK SEPTUAGINT – CASE #6 – PARTS 1 & 2’@ http://grebens.org

*4 Examples: 10 Commandments, Beatitudes, Holy Calendar, Psalms and Proverbs (how to manage as Kings), New Testament; writings of the Holy Fathers and the purpose for the Christian Church. Visit my other articles/blogs (http://grebens.com; http://grebems.org and 2 Books.

*5 Job 38:5-7 ‘Or who stretched the line upon it? To what were its foundations fastened, or who laid it cornerstone, when the stars were made and all My angels praised Me in a loud voice’. See also ‘CREATION MANAGEMENT LAWS - UNIQUENESS OF THE BIBLE – Definitions’ @ http://grebens.org

*6 See ‘MAN'S BRAIN'S PRIORITIZING CAPACITY - PART 3 of 5’ @http://grebens.com

*7 See ‘ALGEBRAIC VS. GEOMETRIC REALITY - Part 4 of 5’ @ http://grebens.com

*8 See GENESIS CHRONOLOGY and GENEALOGY – Greek Septuagint – Case #6 - Part 1 & 2’ @ http://grebens.org and ‘MATERIALISM / PHYSICALISM – DEFINITION - Part 2 of 6’ @ http://grebens.org

*9 It is now common to find on YouTube the information that both the French Revolution and the Bolshevik Revolutions have gone out of the way committed genocide against the Christian populations by the dozens of millions. There was no political or economic reason for doing this, it was purely ideological – Christianity is the only religion that clearly defines the outlines, activities and purposes of the Babylonian snake religion, and has stood in Babylon’s way. The World and specifically America have entered into their final end. The multiple QEs will be used until the American Dollar will be brought to nil value (possibly the end of 2012, when the price of oil will be $200.00 per barrel). American Christians will not be spared and will not see any mercy – ¾ of its Christian population can disappear within months. This happened after the Revolution in Russia. There are so many similarities between what happened in Russia during the WW1 and the Russian Revolution and what is going on in the USA (legally since 2009 – the USA has become the North American Union – not under the American Constitution). The similarities are due to having the same Internationalist Bankers financing the Freemasonic-Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, and having directed America towards its self-destruction since that time to today. The methods, organizations, personalities and methods are identical. The TSA procedures at the Airport and 'Homeland Security' demonstrate a merciless precedent - the Bolshevik prototype management planning and implementation.

MATERIALISM / PHYSICALISM – DEFINITION - Part 5 of 6 @2011

Dr. George Grebens

http://grebens.org

See also: http://WhichOnesAreScientific.com; http://grebens.com, and http://grebens.net

Update: 3 April, 2011

Original Post: 3 January, 2011

NOTE: This is the 5th of 6 presentations on ‘materialism.’ As mentioned in the 1st part, the subject of ‘materialism’ is a part of a three-part application together with ‘uniformitarianism’ and ‘the theory of evolution’ in the ‘evolution, creation, intelligent design, and hybrid’ debate. Yet, of the three, 'materialisms/physicalism' is the most cryptic and the most elusive term. In the West, everyday people, scientists, educators, judicial judges and politicians have gone through their careers and lives without ever suspecting the key component of the neo-evolutionary ‘scientific’ view is materialism. The 'Theory of Evolution' is viewed to be ‘scientific’ solely based on its link to the ideology of ‘materialism’. Materialism's association with the concept of 'science' is similar to its originators' Babylon's magician's 'science of magic,' which has no connection with how to manage an accurate knowledgebase ('conditional certainty'); and the application of DMPS tool to solve 'uncertainty' , i.e., increase accurate knowledge.

Contents:

• Materialist Concepts Reviewed
• Caravaka's Materialist Model Expanded
• Where Does the Materialist Program Really Lead
• George Orwell’s ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’ and ‘Animal Farm

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

MATERIALIST CONCEPTS REVIEWED

When reading, listening or debating materialists; as, for example, it has been a frequent event on the Russian Federation TV, we discover the existence of several ‘materialist’ notions:

1) The most dramatic interpretation and application of materialism during the past 200 years has been the materialism of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin and Mao. Having swayed billions of people around the Earth; its financiers, imperialists, its secret societies and organizations committed genocide against billions of people, while destroying non-materialist civilization.

2) There are many Marxist materialists, having witnessed the implementation of the genocidal horrific materialist ideals now offer apologetics views – that such genocidal, government prison camps, extreme totalitarianism were proof of a gross misunderstanding of the Marxist revolutionary terms and conditions. To this day such Marxist apologists try to formulate a ‘true’ version of quasi-Marxist materialism. These versions offer: a) many alternatives to Marxian materialism; b) non-political and ideological materialisms; c) point to non-Marxist 'socialism;' d) distinctions between the Trotsky, Lenin, Mao's Marxists, etc. However, quasi-Marxist materialists get lost in their Marxism's as they re-create their materialist dictionaries. It is however, important to note the original fundamental criteria of ‘materialist uniformitarianism – neo-evolutionism’.

3) There are other secular versions of ideological, social and political ‘materialisms’ – such as Fascism, Nazism, Fabianism and Americanism .Precedents used to bring about the New World Order around the world - so notoriously depicted in George Orwell's 'Nineteen Eighty Four' and 'Animal Farm'.

4) Other non-Marxist, historical ‘materialist’ views, include pantheism and multi-layered materialisms that co-exist with: polytheism, theisms, phallic worshiping cults, myth-based ritualism, animalism, hedonism and divination and demonism, etc. Examining the history of 6th century Indian and Asiatic materialism, reveal many such versions. Most of these have been describe in Parts 3 and 4 of 5.

Modern Materialism could have chosen any of the historical versions of materialisms (see #4 above) – including Buddhism, which has axiomatic positions, social, ideological, ethical, state rules, etc. Yet Modern Materialists selected a materialism from India’s history that closely resembles its Babylonian system (see Part 2 of 5) –i.e., the materialism of Caravaka (see ‘D’ on Part 3 of 5) – 6th Century B.C., which also includes the Lokayata system. Caravaka provides a prototype 'materialist' ideology and sociology, which we know today as a truely Modern Materialist model. Both Caravaka and the Modern Materialist model reflect clearly the early Babylonian financial rather than the 'scientific' model.

CARAVAKA'S MATERIALIST MODEL EXPANDED

Below is the expanded text from Caravaka's model presented in 'Materialism/Physicalism - Definition - Part 3 of 5' @ http://grebens.org:

I Axiomatic statements:

1. Religion is man’s invention and not that of some divine authority
2. Reject the view of an after-life*1
3. Everything occurs naturally through the mechanisms of nature (similar to 1st or 5 points of materialistic uniformitarianism rules) – ‘Today’s/current events, conditions, rates and processes’ (see the five rules below and in Part 1 of 5)
4. Since there is a certainty of death -
5. Indulge the senses today (like Greek ‘Epicureans’)*2

II Type of Dialectical and Reductionist methods *3

1. Four elements in the universe: earth, water, fire, air and the combination of hot and cold, being fat and lean are the same subject. This is equivalent to interplay of ‘chance’ - refer to the 3rd, and ‘simple-to-complex’ - 4th of 5 materialistic uniformitarian points - see Figure 40) (see list 11-5 below)
2. Intelligence is derived from the material four elements (II - 1.) of the universe (Note: some of Caravaka's dialectic duos lead to absurdities, e.g., "in 'I am fat", ‘I am lean’, these attributes abide in the same subject, and since fatness, reside only in the body, it alone is the soul and no other, and such phrases as 'my body' are only significant metaphorically’*4.
3. Inferences may be permitted, speculative metaphysics is to be avoided (i.e., ‘closed system’ - see the similarities with #5 in Figure 40 below).
4. Reject the 'cast system' because the human body is the same (i.e., 'simple-to-complex' #4 on Figure 40 - similar and without distinction from 'animal' bodies - e.g., primates)
5. The ‘three authors of the Vedas were buffoons, knaves, and demons’*4 This is an extention of the fifth point of the materialistic uniformitarian concept - see #5 on Figure 40.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Figure 40 -The Five Materialistic Uniformitarian Points:

1. Today’s/current events, conditions, rates and processes, and by
2. Extrapolating these to the past – to the beginning (e.g., the Big Bang) and
3. Through statistical progression ('chance')
4. Lead from the simple-to-complex or primitive-to-modernist processes
5. All accomplished within the framework of a closed system – i.e., without any participating exterior force (divine entities, God)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

The Modern Materialistic Uniformitarians follow Caravaka - who focuses on specific characteristics:

a) Its own exclusive non-mythological-based vocabulary, concepts, dictionary

b) Seeks a standard for evaluating reality – reductionism

c) Evaluates and grades the teachings and authority of mythological writers’ as being the product of ‘buffoons, knaves, and demons’ (see II-5 above). However, such an appraisals should seek objective criteria, that would help prove that either the appraiser and/or the appraised qualify under the same criteria - i.e., ‘buffoons, knaves and demons.’ In other words, how can the materialist prove that he/she/it escapes the same appraisal criteria and evaluation? For example, in the modern world, materialistic uniformitarianists, e.g., in former USSR, the Soviet Courts accused religious people of idiocy and insanity, and because of such evaluations, the religious were placed into insane asylums for treatment. Wouldn't Soviet Courts, psychiatrists and administrative managers also qualify for such verdicts since religion and ideology reflect similar frameworks (see 'Ideology's Similarities with Religion' Part 1 of 5' @ http://grebens.com? Yet, the one-sided criteria have been used in Communist controlled countries for decades, to justify genocidal programs against Christian European nations Similarly, in the USA there are 'activist Federal Judges’ (United Nations) who pass decisions that censure the ‘unscientific character’ Christian Creationists and Intelligent Design scientists*5. This includes not only activist Judges, but also Educational Systems administration*5, University Deans and Boards who reject academic tenure to highly qualified science professors who had among other things, discovered up to 12 planets*6. Decisions and legislation that had thousands lose their job and had ended their careers*6. And not to forget directives issued and implemented by legions of ideological debunkers*7 who are guided by the National Academy of Sciences ‘Science and Creationism’*8.

d) Caravaka’s ‘human rights’ statement rejects the ‘cast system’ on the basis of the similarity among human bodies (see II-4 above). The axiomatic statement, is inevitably linked a wider field of axioms that express themselves through various ‘derivatives’, e.g., the ‘hedonistic rights’ axiom (see I-5 above). Under such conditions we find hidden sub-‘cast system’ issues that are evident in today’s ‘human rights’ applications - which in spite of the original 'anti-cast system' re-introduce the division among: class, groups, age, generation, gender, etc. Expansion of such axioms inevitably leads to the justification for genocide and even cannibalism. For example, here are some examples of materialists who applied this 'body-based equality' to initiate social cleansing – i.e., ‘materialistic Jihads’: the materialist Marxists prioritizes the class purity – ‘Proletariat’ (working people) and went about committing genocide against the Bourgeoisie, Capitalists and Christians. The materialist Nazis promoted race purity (the Folk) and devalued the Slavs, Gypsies, Jews, other 'sub-humans' and Christians - those who filled concentartion camps and ranks of slave labor. The materialist Americanists who proimote an anti-Christian New World Order – has its divisional focus extending to all possible social divisions: age – particularly with Obamacare (abortion and early euthenasia of senior citizens whose health care will be too expensive, death panels; see similarities with the Nazi T4 policy – ‘Affordable Health Care for America Act’ - HR 3962)*9. Earlier notions of the 1970's: ‘do not trust anyone over 30’; distinctions among middle and upper middle class (IRS); generation gaps, gender (feminism); Intelligence Quotient (IQ); mis-education (dumbing down)*10; turning the Patriot Act against gun owners and the majority of Americans who due to their adhearance to the American Constitition and Christian principles are now viewed as insurgents against the treasonous New American Union (which unites the USA with Mexico and Canada - in 2009 and the New World Order and neutralizes the constitutional United States of America. Increasingly, there is no recognition of nationality - everyone is a potential citizen of the world, right to live anywhere (balkanization), no borders ('invasion'?). However, this internationalization of everyone, also allows the new World Masters to implement forced population displacement and relocation programs. View that no single religion can be placed above another (pluralism); no cultural standards; intellectual and creative relativism; religions is considered to be better than cultism, Satanism and myth. Since the 'material body' is the only criteria upon which equality and evaluation is established, rather than the use of cultural and ethical indices that reflect and lead to qualitative infrastructural improvement, innovation and invention; humans are inevitably compared with standards of the animal kingdom - similar to, 'evolved from' primates.

Caravaka’s axiomatic ‘Indulge the senses today’ (see I-5 above) leads to hedonism, phallic worshiping religions, degradation of the arts, sciences, which leads to the breakdown of the family unit, promotion of single parents - towards the search that satisfies one’s comfort zone, socialization of sex and abolition of marriage. Insults, deception, crime, State sponsored terrorism as a means of 'persuasion,' depopulation schemes become easy for the Internationalist Order to implement, since the neo-animal's 'mind' has been spun around relativism and doesn't have objective criteria to determine what is right and wrong.

e) Let's review: 1) since, man’s brain’s prioritizing capacity*11 forms a hierarchy of priorities. Since the highest priority, which acquires divine-like quality, that will be defended until death, whose priorities determine in-/sanity; from which all secondary priorities are de-prioritize in an organized structure, then 2) it is clear to recognize that the materialists’ highest priority must by definition, policy and implementation be identified with pantheism - the prioritization and worship of nature). See more details in 'Materialism /Physicalism - Definition - Epilog Part 6 of 6' @ http://grebens.org.

Caravaka’s approach provides an original materialist’s profile: a) an axiomatic standard, and b) an ideological and sociological program. It is also possible to identify here a materialistic-naturalist-atheistic program that is coupled with a specifically targeted anti-mythological program.

Note1: Some promote the false notion that 'materialism=science & technology; vs. 'religion=Medievalism & subjective mythology.' It should be noted that Caravaka's materialist model (India, 6th century B.C.) had NOT developed into any type nor improved level of 'science' and 'technology.' On the other hand, in Christian Europe - this is almost 2000 years later - true science (3DMM) and the scientific method (DMPS) had developed. It is in Europe - almost 2000 years after Caravaka's materialism - that Christianity created the favorable environment where true science (3DMM) and the scientific method (DMPS) had been developed. This was before materialist uniformitarianism (similar to CARAVAKA's Materialist Model) had been established. Christian Europe had established all branches of science by the 18th and 19th centuries. This was accomplished without materialist ideological derivatives such as 'reductionism', 'relativism', 'empiricism', 'subjectivism,' 'secularism,' 'behaviorism,' and others mentioned earlier in these articles/blogs.

WHERE DOES THE MATERIALIST PROGRAM REALLY LEAD?

The article entitled ‘Financier’s Total World Collectivist Dictatorial Power – A Timeline Formula’ @ http://grebens.com provides a comprehensive Timeline of the Modern Materialists’ plan, purposes and objectives. The ‘Materialist’s’ Financial Control is historically nothing more than the continuation program of the pre-Flood failed civilization results; and the post-Flood’s Babylon rationalist-based world view:

1. The early ‘snake’-focused religion, promoted by Babylon’s followers (see Part 2 of 5), across seven rises and falls throughout history to this day’s International Bankers agenda. It began to infiltrate Christendom by the 11th century AD, and has financially managed the affairs of kingdoms and states to this minute.
2. Rationalism (e.g., Descartes) and Empiricism have been the initial visible evidence in Europe that placed the networking features that would lead to Christendom’s demise by WW1 to WW3.
3. The materialistic scope that emerged from this penetrating plan is nothing more than this ‘snake’-‘rationalist’-'financial' operation that has been conducted cryptically under the radar
4. Civilizations are penetrated at the highest level and then led towards failed civilizations (e.g., 13th/14th century in West Europe - the Dark Ages, Bubonic Plague where 2/3rds of Europe's population perished).
5. Such a cryptic and cynical system doesn’t accept competition
6. Such a system needs only enough to exist and maintain a human population at controllable and self-sustainable level
7. Such population is trained to have no will or thought of its own, except what is provided by the masters.
8. The Theory of Evolution makes it clear that there are two types of evolved higher beings – a) one master race that controls the economy of all resources; and b) other human beings that are maintained like cattle, a just above level of primates to serve the first (a).
9. The higher materialist banking specie will be regarded to be ‘gods’ with its high-techno power; while the rest of the unprivileged and dumbed down neo-primates will be bred for various purposes and functions.

Perhaps George Orwell’s ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’ and ‘Animal Farm’ describe this emerging condition that will shift all power and might to the Financier’s Total World Collectivist Dictatorial Power *12.

GEORGE ORWELL'S 'NINETEEN EIGHTY FOUR' AND 'ANIMAL FARM'

The 13th/14th Centuries West European Black Death was but one event (a prototype of what is to come), in a series that was designed to bring about the Financier's Total World Collectivist Dictatorial Power. Where does George Orwell’s ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’ and ‘Animal Farm fall in this multi-century saga?

The one Christian Church that existed in the Christianized Roman Empire from the 4th century A.D. was split into two parts in 1054 A.D. - divided between Roman Catholicism and Orthodox Christianity over the Filioque issue*13.

While Roman Catholicism was led to see a 'Reformation' and Protestant movement break away from its religious authority between the 13th and 15th centuries; the Orthodox Constantinople (Byzantine) Empire began to fall under the Internationalist Bankers influence between the 11th century A.D., and its final defeated by the Moslems in 1454 A.D. Russia took up the Christian Byzantine tradition until it too fell under the Bankers': a) Free Masonic dominated West European policies (World War 1); b) the USA's succumbing to the 'Internationalist' Federal Reserve; and the c) financially directed Bolshevik Revolution in 1917.

The last points on the Internationalist Banking Agenda was: d) launching of WW2; e) establish the United Nation Organization, whose Charter reflects international socialist principles, to which all nations had to subscribe (sign); f) promotion of perpetual wars in the developing nations (Third World); g) bank controlled socialization of West Europe (e.g., Eurozone); h) downfall of the Soviet Block under the International Banking control; i) bankruptcy of the USA with world austerity programs; and j) World War 3.

It is at this point that George Orwell's 1984 and Animal Farm become meaningful. America has dramatically changed in the past two years in preparation for the Orwellian Fascist world. American stimulus money (in the trillions) bought off the media, communications, all industries - manufacturing, agriculture, food production; the creation of a Banker's security force (e.g., TSA with its: microwaving security control and its sexually oriented practices at Airports, Bus stations, highways (reflecting a Babylonian phallic-worshiping religion); Homeland Security with its FEMA Camps; Nazi T4 medical plan with death panels; massive depopulation schemes - Carbon Emissions Tax, Copenhagen Summit with its 80% human genocide option, etc.)

We read that 1984 is set in the middle of WW3 - three geographic areas that are under a war condition. Everything is government centralized (Big Brother), and food, products are rationed - total austerity. Being under total surveillance (teleaudioscreens in every nook and cranny) is one thing, but the 500-word vocabulary and thinking (Newspeak, doublethink) imposes increasingly an internal barrier, and leads to dialectically meaningless: 'war is peace,' 'love is brainwashing, torture and hate,' 'freedom is slavery.'

This collapsed civilization creates relative environments where a new level of reality emerges: a sado-masochistic relationship among people and specifically with the Big Brother and his 'Homeland Security' environment.

The only way that any of the brainwashed serfs can survive is by wholeheartedly embracing the idea that Big Brother is the 'benevolent' (demonic) benefactor /terrorist, while you are the faulty, yet redeemable through prescribed brainwashing in becoming a more refined masochist - a subservient proletariat/worker. Among other responsibilities, you become a more refined citizen when you report on everyone (see above Homeland Security, who provide you with a phone for reporting).

Another reality emerges: the road to the past is not only blurred but rendered irreversible. Orwellian existence has a built in system erases all standards by which one may compare conditions in the past with those of the Orwellian present. Suddenly, Figure 40 -'The Five Materialistic Uniformitarian Points' acquire a new texture of 'realism' - a new standard for determining what constitutes: normalcy, existence; as well as, for determining what is: absurdity, irrelevance, stupidity, criminality. Let's review the 5 standard points of Materialisting Uniformitarianism/Neo Evolutionism:

1. Today’s/current events, conditions, rates and processes, and by
2. Synthetically, extrapolating these to the past – to the edited beginning
3. Through statistical progression ('chance') - i.e., casino gambling, i.e., relative Party direction
4. Lead from the simple-to-complex or primitive-to-modernist processes
5. All accomplished within the framework of a closed system – i.e., without any participating exterior force (divine entities, God) -

The more we follow this 5-fold path - the more we remove ourselves from the primitive and hazardous past (anarchistic freedom/license, without the homeland security) and move into a collectivist brotherhood guided by Big Brother/Sister - into the real utopian present.

Clearly, the materialist uniformitarians /evolutionists have had an advanced preparatory training and mindset for the Orwellian sado-masochistic life style. They:

a) Have been sifted for purity of 'evolutionary' superior vs. inferior positions

b) Positioned themselves within the amnesiac approach to the 'simple' 'primitive' past - thus having reduced the 3DMM to a truncated 'simpler' 2DMM that has rendered all Executive functions invisible

c) And by this, they daily brainwash themselves into a zombie state while remaining in a pure and perpetual condition of 'uncertainty' allowing yourself to be guided into a pseudo-utopia (fool's paradise) by Big Borther (see 'Science & the Scientific Method - Definition - Zombiism' @ http://grebens.org).

The EPILOG for this series of articles appears separately 'MATERIALISM / PHYSICALISM – DEFINITION - EPILOG - Part 6 of 6' @ http://grebens.org

References ----------------------------------------------

*1 Potter, Karl H., ‘The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies: Buddhist philosophy from 350 to 600 A.D’ Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publications, 2007, p 188.

*2 Potter, Karl H., ‘The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies: Buddhist Philosophy from 350 to 600 A.D.,’ Motilal Banarsidass Publications, Delhi, 2007.

*3 Nambiar, Sita Krishna,‘Prabodhacandrodaya of Krsna Misra,’ Motilal Banarasidass, Delhi, 1971.

*4 Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya (ed.), Carvaka/Lokayata, ‘An Anthology of Source Materials and Some Recent Studies,’ Indian Council of Philosophical Research, New Delhi, 1990. See also 'Scientificism and Catholicism' @ http://grebens.com where scientificists attempt to adapt the concept of 'metaphysics' to meet their own purposes, yet fail because of the paradoxical limitations of the definitions.

*5 Supreme Court rule in Epperson vs. Arkansas case (393 U.S. 97 - 1968) invalidating laws that prohibited the teaching of evolution in the classroom - issue of Establishment Clause; Edwards vs. Aguillard (482 U.S. 578 - 1987) Louisiana - ruling that invalidated laws that required equal time for teaching creationism and evolution; McLean vs. Arkansas Board of Education, 529 F. Supp. 1255, US District Court, 1982 - Establishment Clause; Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District (Case #04cv2688) - Federal Court ruled that Intelligent Design is not appropriate for inclusion in science classrooms and is essentially religious in nature, Selman vs., Cobb Country School District (2005, Georgia) - disclaimers stickers to be placed into biology books that stated that evolution was only a theory and not a fact, was ruled by Federal Distrinct Judge Clarence Cooper to be unconstitutional and in violation of the Establishment Clause of the US Constitution.

See also: 'Court Decisions on What is 'Scientific' - Case #5 @http://grebens.org. Also: 'National Academy of Sciences' 'Rule Book' - Case #2' @ http://grebens.org. Also: 'National Academy of Sciences' 'Rule Book' - Case #2' @ http://grebens.org. Also: 'Ideology's Similarities with Religion - Part 1 of 5' @ http://grebens.com. Also: 'Scientists - Professional and Ideological' @ http://grebens.com.

*6 A partial example of this reality can be seen described in ‘Expelled: No Intelligent Allowed’ starring' Ben Stein, 2008

*7 A classic example among many: Henke, K.R., Young-Earth creationist Helium Diffusion “dates” (March 17, 2005 at http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/zircons.html; Henke, K.R. “young-earth creationist helium diffusion “dates” (November 24, 2005) http://www.,talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/zirocons.html; and rebuttal by Dr. Russell Humphreys, http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/original.html; http://www.trueorigin.org/helium01.asp ; and http://www.trueorigin.org/helium02.asp . Written debate on www.trueorigin.org between Douglas Theobald (evolutionist) who presented his “29 Evidences for Macroevolution”, and Ashby Camp (creationist) who responded to fallacies presented in Theobald’s work. Mark Isaak’s “Problem with a Global Flood,” Second Edition, The Talk Origins Archive, November 16, 1998 – http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-noahs-ark.html ; and the rebuttal by J. Sarfati, “Problems with a Global Flood?”1998, http://www.trueorigin.org/arkdefend.asp

*8 http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=6024; See also: ‘National Academy of Science Version 1’ Rule Book – Case #2’ @ http:// grebens.org; ‘Court Decisions on What is Scientific – Case #5’ @ http:// grebens.org; ‘Purpose of Scientific Models is to help Interpret Empirical Data, Make predictions and Determine Which Scientific Model is Better ’ @ http:// WhichOnesAreScientific.com; and other.

*9 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama_health_care_plan_of_2009

*10 Thomson Iserbyt, Charlotte, ‘The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America - A Chronological Paper Trail,’ Conscious Press, Ravenna Press, Ohio, 1999

*11 'Man's Brain's Prioritizing Capacity - Part 3 of 5' @http://grebens.com

*12 ‘Financier’s Total World Collectivist Dictatorial Power – A Timeline Formula’ @ http://grebens.com

*13 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filioque

SINGULARITIES: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6; JUDAS ISCARIOT and MODERNISM – Case #9 - Part 2 of 2 © 2011

Dr. George Grebens

http://grebens.org

See also: http://WhichOnesAreScientific.com; http://grebens.com, and http://grebens.net

Update: 11 February, 2011

Original Post: 06 February, 2011

Note: This article/blog is the continuation from the same title 'Part 1 of 2'

Let’s re-examine the profile of the son of perdition:  2 Thessalonians 2:3-4 ‘Let no man deceive you by any means [1]: for that day shall not come, [2] unless the falling away comes first, and [3] that man of sin be revealed, [4] the son of perdition, [5] who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God, or [6] that is worshipped; so [7] that he sits as God in [8] the temple of God, [9] showing himself that he is God.'

What can be noted is:

1. There will be attempts throughout history to call various individuals, organizations, religions/ideologies as being – ‘son of perdition’ (destruction - anti-Christ) [1]
2. However, the emergence of such a figure cannot occur [2] until the Christian majority will succumb to financial/materialist-sponsored initiatives (e.g., materialist uniformitarianism, relativism, reductionism) to help not only deceive the Christian Church, but to have it convincingly promote: (a) non-Christian pagan doctrines, and (b) work against the Christian mission – through the continuing Modernist Ecumenical Councils that have lead and will lead to the belief that ‘Salvation’ is achievable through: the Judeo-Christian option, then the Judeo-Christian-Islamic option, and finally through the Pantheon of international religions/ideologies/cults. Under such circumstances the original apostolic true Christian Church will be relegated to being a dangerous brainwashing cult – becoming a ‘neo-catacomb’ Christianity.
3. It is under this ‘falling away first’ condition that the ‘man of sin will be revealed’ as the only ‘righteous’ option [3]. The bankruptcy of the world economic system (what is occurring now) will allow the International Banking financiers - as they did before WW1, Bolshevik Revolution, WW2, Maoist Revolution - to bring about their collectivist systems, using all ‘dumbing down’ (Zombiist) tools through media, propaganda/marketing, sciences and technology, to focus on promoting one ‘pre-packaged’ ‘man of sin’ who will bring about ‘extraordinary’ as if ‘magical’ solutions.
4. Here, the ‘man of sin’ is also associated with (linked to) ‘the son of perdition’ [4]. Why is this ‘man of sin’ a ‘SON’ of perdition/‘destruction’? Because such ‘perdition’ has a history not only to Judas Iscariot and the Babylonian priesthood in the Jerusalem Temple - at the time of the 1st Advent, but can be traced further back to the total destruction of the Eternal Lord God’s perfect Creation and specifically to the Garden of Eden – i.e., introduction of the 2nd Singularity. This is to the similar intent, purpose, supervisory plans (pantheist, rationalist, and reductionist) and decision-making process that damaged the infrastructural energy flux density of all Creation, to ‘death’; and to the historical Babylonian cancer that consistently destroys civilizations.
5. Judas Iscariot, an accountant by trade, attempted to manipulate (manage) and re-direct both the Jerusalem Priesthood objectives and Jesus Christ’s Mission to help him accommodate and implement his modus operandi – i.e., have Jesus Christ become the promised Messiah of the Kingdom of Israel who would rule the world. Here, Judas Iscariot – Jesus Christ’s disciple – would have held an ‘inner circle’ position, and would see that all would be settled economically (as with the multiplication of fish and bread), righteously (e.g., judgment and punishment of the incompetent Babylonian Jerusalem pluralist priesthood); unite all humanity under one controlled umbrella, pluralism - democracy); etc. [5]
6. In such a position, Judas envisioned that Jesus Christ and His apostles would be worshiped as God. However, since the first plan didn’t succeed, the new ‘son of perdition’ extend Judas’ management model, in his solo position in the end times, the neo-Judas would rule over all – the Babylonian priesthood, bankers and his re-defined Modernist Judeo-Christian-Islamic-World Religionist [6]
7. Under such absolutist conditions, with his conditioned half-starved and conditioned population he would be worshiped as God and thus become God, just as many of the Roman Emperors have taken on the title of ‘god’ - [7] that he sits as God in [8] the temple of God,
8. Such a divine Judas’ ‘son of perdition’ would have absolute power that would transcend any other management model, his will would rule supreme, his inherent inclination would not only betray the true God, but keep manipulating circumstances to ‘force’ his view of God into his scheme and plans – i.e., he would oppose God’s mission by imposing his own plans, and control God as an economic ‘human resource’. Under such circumstances he would be worshipped; because he would manipulate the economy, establish law, control all means of communication through which he would creating a new reality [9] showing himself that he is God.’ See George Orwell’s ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’ and ‘Animal Farm.’

This situation would have occurred with Nimrod (descendent of Noah’s son Ham-Cush-Raamah) and his construction of the Tower of Babel (Gen.10:9-10; 11:1-6) in 2665 YFC or 2846 B.C. But the rise and rule of the ‘son of perdition’ at that early time in history had been pre-empted by the Eternal Lord God (‘Let Us go down and… - i.e., the Trinity’ (Gen.11:6-9), since the Savior was not yet born (4th Singularity) to bring salvation from ‘death’ – through the resurrection (5th Singularity).

Earlier still, this terminal condition had reached a ‘point of no return’ – i.e., before the Global Flood (2263 YFC or 3247 B.C.), where even with: a) Noah’s evidence of the Ark (size of the ship 'Queen Mary')*14; b) Noah’s preaching for 120 years (Gen. 6:3) while constructing the Ark, with the assistance of Lamech, Methuselah (both who lived during the time, having died before the Flood – 2227 and 2256 YFC respectively); c) their families and their righteous followers involved in the project – between the years 2143 YFC, i.e., 3328 B.C., and the actual beginning of the Flood (2262 YFC or 3247 B.C.) *15 and d) after witnessing how animals were moving two by two and seven by seven from the open gates of the Garden of Eden to the Ark (that was constructed and located next to the angelic-guarded gate to the Garden of Eden); e) only Noah’s family actually entered the Ark seven days before the start of the cataclysmic 'hydro-tectonic' Flood.

Needless to say, that even if there were believers in the Theory of Evolution (materialist uniformitarians) and those of the Babylonian persuasion such as those who existed later during the 1st Advent; and if they wouldn’t have crucified Noah because of their 'zombiist'-thinking patterns*16, and their economics- filtered applied theology, they might have allowed themselves:

1. To partially go along with Noah's proposed Global Flood hypothesis by postulating alternate 'mythological' purposes for this Ark -
2. To speculate about the construction of the Ark as an attempt to overcome a local Flood - even though the dimensions of the Ark*14, as the construction over time (120 years - Gen. 6:3) began to increasingly contratradict the local Flood theory.
3. While the 'zoological' procession (Gen.7:2-3) being a unique event because up to that time, the Edenic gate had been shut and guarded for 2262 years (YFC), i.e., from 5510 B.C. to 2747 B.C.,*17 was cynically interpreted to have been designed as a distraction - a 'staged marketing event' for entertainment purposes only.

No doubt, at moments before the eminant Flood, the MUE (Materialist Uniformitarian Evolutionary) 'zombiist reasoning' *15 and the Babylonian Modernist interpretations/speculations - as it will, in the future persuade the masses to choose Barabbas over Jesus Christ*18 - would have persuaded even the most faithful believers, such as the sons and daughter of Lamech and Methuselah, from opting from the Noachian hypothesis, i.e., to stay put and not venture into Noachian adventurism. This would inevitably lead to the collective drowning in the Global Flood. In other words, we would not find any MUE and Babylonian Modernists in Noah's Ark with Noah and his immediate family.

This conclusion brings us to the next three Singularities that can be developed in greater detail in the following articles.

These additional Singularities include:

The 6th Singularity – 2nd Advent ‘Day of Atonement’ – 7th Month

The 7th Singularity - Great Day, the ‘Great Judgment Day’ – 7th Month.

The 8th Singularity - Kingdom of Heaven – ‘Feast of Tabernacles’ – 7th Month.

Reference-------------------------------

*1 ‘National Academy of Sciences’ Rule Book – Case #2’ @ http://grebens.org

*2 see ‘Knowledge (science) a 3D Management Issue’ @ http://WhichOnesAreScientific.com, also and other blogs in this series.

*3 see Figure 42 and 43

*4 see Figure 42 and 43

*5 ‘National Academy of Sciences’ Rule Book – Case #2’ @ http://grebens.org

*6 Figure 43 shows the parallel events that occurred: a) in the Garden of Eden when Eve selected the fruit from the forbidden tree and b) the Passover (1st Advent) – the event where the woman with the alabaster flask of very costly fragrant oil, and poured it on His head Mat 26:7-8). Here the transgression (selection of the deadly fruit in the Garden of Eden going against the will of God), and the repentance (woman-oil-on-Jesus Christ's head) - both occurring on the 10th day, second week, in the 1st Month (Abib).

*7 In pursuit of their absolute power in an occupied land by the Roman Empire, the Jerusalem Temple priests at the time of Christ and their promoters throughout time to this day, have resorted to extreme methods of control – thought control; Supervisory plans: policy, procedures, rules & regulation (within a 2DMM), while totally misunderstanding the Executive plan and the 3DMM. For example: they employ various levels of such control:

a. Passive control, where various ‘authorized’ rituals, rules, issues and regulations are imposed upon the population, who fear to bring disapproval from the ‘authorities’ (Mat. 23:4ff)

b. Investigative control, where various front operatives and organizations create conditions of entrapment (Mat.22:19ff)

c. Corruptive control, where rewards, financials, gain, security, choice positions, threats, forced persuasion) direct the activities of individuals, groups, leaders or societies (Mat.26:15; 28:12-14; Acts 25:2ff)

d. Misrepresentation of facts, roles, character assassinations, confiscation, and accusations (Acts 6:11-14); (Mat 24:19; 25:7)

e. Coalitions (Acts 6:11-12; 17:5; 25:15-21)

f. Gang orders (Acts 5:28, 40)

g. Arrest (Acts 4: 5: 12)

h. Persecution (Acts 8:3)

i. Murder Incorporated (John 19:15f; Acts 5:30; 23:12-15)

j. Persuasion (procedural, legal or rebellion) through legal authority (Mat.27:1-2; 15ff)

All these Babylonian activities, among others, proceeded from the high priests’ seat (e.g., Mat 26:3ff). Jesus Christ identifies those who used such management practices as ‘the wicked and unfaithful people.’ This is a description of the role of the Babylonian Talmudists in society, government, education, intelligence, secret societies – ‘secularism’ and in the Modernist Ecumenical Council - Judeo-Christian religion.

These Babylonians-Modernists expect the world to think of them as being the final authority on all issues (Talmud 67 volumes). They are the consultants, the intelligence and information centers, identifiers (accusers) of the ‘enemy of the chosen people’ (Talmudists). They are at the base of the ‘mysteries of lawlessness’ (2 Thessalonains 2:7) lying (v11) deception (v 9); accusers; all deceivableness of unrighteousness (v10); create strong delusions.

These are the creatures that the Modernist accept as the ‘chosen people’ – though the ‘chosen people’ of the Babylonian contract (see Figure 39 – Genesis Chronology – Genealogy @ http://grebens.org and 'Materialism/Physicalism – Definitions – Part 2 of 5' @ http://grebens.org for clear distinctions about the Biblical peoples that provide lineages to today’s conditions.

*8 From the time Jesus Christ formed the Apostolic group, Jesus, His apostles and Judas were involved in doing only good, saw and did miracles, which Judas was never able to explain (e.g., multiplication of bread and fish that fed 5000). In Jesus’ group there was genuine friendship, trust, hope, love, dedication, forgiveness, which Judas found nowhere else. And now, after these shadowy events Judas could see only a hypocritical and deadly Mafioso-type imitation of what represented God – the temple, priests, rituals, deception, envy, exploitation, fear, suspicion, sickness, death, hopelessness, infernal existence. These ‘high priests’ of the Babylonian contract did not care whether the accused was guilty or innocent (Mat. 27:4) – what was at stake, they saw, was the perpetuation of their unconditional power.

*9 The other eleven apostles did not quite grasp the meaning of Jesus Christ’s divinity until His appearance after the resurrection (Mark 16:11; Luke 24:11; John 20:24f)

*10 Throughout history, many authors have tried to interpret Judah’s motives – here’s a summary view of the Judas-case. All interpretations appear to diverge and lack something – the credible trigger point and its related association, and Judas’ activity against four points: (a) Jesus Christ’s predestined plan of Salvation (5th Singularity); (b) at least two plans working against (a) that of Babylon and later Rome; (c) Blindness of the participants; (d) Judas’ own limitations. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judas_Iscariot

*11 The meaning of the word ‘perdition’ (Greek ‘apoleia’ G 684) is; ‘ruin, loss, damnable, destruction, die, perdition, pernicious ways, and waste). The Greek ‘tyerm’ is used 21 times in the New Testament. In addition to these verses we also find that the word also appears in: Mat 7:13 (destruction); 26:8 (waste); Mark 14:4 (waste); Acts 8:20 (let money perish); 25:16 (die); Rom 9:22 (destruction); 2 Pet. 2:1 (damnable heresies, destructive); v 2 – pernicious; v3 – damnation; 3:7 perdition of ungodly men; 3:16 destruction.

*12 Old Testament referenced prophecies include: Psalm 40:10; 108:2-13; and Zec 11:12-13.

*13 We read that Jesus’ Apostles reacted with indignation when a woman used an alabaster flask of very costly (300 pence) fragrant oil, poured it on His head Mat 26:7-8; Mark 14:4 – It is Judas’ accountant’s mind that detected that his CEO was preparing for burial, and this meant that Judah’s position as an apostle – i.e., the ‘inner circle’ position was being jeopardized – it was not only ending but was coming to an termination – i.e., the closure of all accounts.

*14 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Queen_Mary. Note6: A cubit is the measure of length, from the elbow to the extremity of the middle finder (2 Chron. 3:3; Ezek. 40:5), which varied between 15 to 22 inches*19. The Book of Genesis 6:14 - 16 provides dimensions of Noah's Ark: 'Make yourself an ark of square timber. You shall make the ark in compartments, and cover it inside and outside with pitch. Thus you shall make the ark: three hundred cubits in length [4500 to 6600 inches], fifty cubits in breadth [750 to 1100 inches], and thirty cubits in heights [450 to 660]. Now when you assemble the ark, you shall gradually finish it up to a cubit at the top [15 to 22 inches], and set the door in its side. You shall make the ark with lower, second, and third stories.' The Ark didn't have any type of propulsion; being a highly balanced barge-like structure, it under the influence of the Moon and Sun's gravity had to overcome enormous tidal waves; up to 80 miles/hr of ocean currents; temperature inversions; due to undersea volcanic activity: miles of layered sedimentation flows and layering, hydro-tectonic activity leading to underwater separation of landmasses into continents, creation of mountain and valley formations - all during a period of 12 months. Waters began to settle down among and run down from the newly formed higher land masses and new underwater structures, Animals in this Ark were juveniles rather than adults, and under much cooler temperatures, travelled in hibernated condition. This hydro-geologic-geographic-volcanic (estimated 50,000 underwater and land surface volcanoes), atmospheric and climatological conditions continued for another 272 years until an Ice Age started and lasted up to 805 years (2535 YFC to 2240 YFC) [see Figure 39 - Genesis Chronology - Genealogy' @ http://grebens.org) until the high volcanic atmospheric cloud cover began to dissipate (due to less volcanic activity and cooling oceans); large ice packs began to melt and the began to raise oceanic waters by about 500 ft around the equator, drying out land masses of vegetation (originally the Pyramids and Sphinx were set in a jungle-like environment) - the 1st great Famine (3340 YFC to 3369 YFC); and the rise of ocean waters - about 100 ft, in the northern and southern hemispheres. For several generations, Shem (son of Noah) and their descendants identified living areas and distributed animals around the ever changing Earth - note that the Zodiac was established during this early time as a highly reliable navigational tool and the Gospel of Salvation message schedule. Note9: today's Earth surface reflects the scars of the above Flood and post-Flood adjustments. It is important to note that around the Earth and on the Moon there is a clear effect of meteorite activity. Research should be expanded not only upon the Earth but to condition of the Solar System: planets, their moons, asteroids, etc. that clearly reflects not uniformitarian long-ages but recent cataclysmic events.

*15 see Figure 39 – Genesis Chronology – Genealogy – Greek Septuagint Version’ @ http:// grebens.org

*16 See 'Science & the Scientific Method vs. Zombiism - Part 3' @ http://grebens.org

*17 See 'Figure 39 - Genesis Chronology - Genealogy - Greek Septuagint Version' @ http:// grebens.org

*18 Matthew 27:15 - 26.

*19 'Dictionary Concordance of the New American Bible'; Catholic World Press, C.D. Stampley Enterprises, Inc., 1970, pg. 109)

SINGULARITIES: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6; JUDAS ISCARIOT and MODERNISM – Case #9 - Part 1 of 2 © 2011

Dr. George Grebens

http://grebens.org

See also: http://WhichOnesAreScientific.com; http://grebens.com, and http://grebens.net

Update: 08 February, 2011

Original Post: 06 February, 2011

DRAFT

Table of Contents:

• Introduction
• 2nd Singularity
• Heavenly Corrections and Parallels
• Judas’ Role During Passover - Unique and Key Development -
• 2, 4, 5, 6 Singularities vs. Son of Perdition

Introduction

Who would suspect that events that led to the 2nd Singularity in the Garden of Eden (Days 10-14 of the year ‘0’ YFC (Year From Creation) or 5510 B.C. (see ‘Figure 39 – Genesis Chronology – Genealogy – Greek Septuagint Version @ http://grebens.org) would lead to a multitude of events, occurrences, every human depravity, betrayal, and the most compact cross-purposes in order to prevent the correction of the 2nd Singularity, that occurred 5450 years earlier. The after-effects of this conflict has continued through the following two millennia and is about to culminate and be resolved within the next few years. The Babylonian system that has worked feverishly during the past 500-years, invisible to all as a snake in the grass, has finally triumphed as it exposes its exposed its horns, teeth, venomous effect and its true colors, in the last two years as it has overtaken the mighty USA. It will, however, also come to account for its methods, deeds as it promotes its opponent’s (satanic) management purposes some 7435 Years After Creation (YAC).

2nd Singularity

What role does Judas of Iscariot play with the 2nd Singularity in the world’s scheme of things? First, let’s examine what are the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Singularities: (reference also ‘Figure 39 – Genesis Chronology – Genealogy – Greek Septuagint Version @ http://grebens.org.)

The 1st Singularity identifies Divine Creation ‘Ab Infinito’ (‘from Infinity’) (rather than an 'Ex Nihilo!' (‘Out of Nothing') Creation. The ‘Ab Infinito’ Creation occurs during the first 7 days of the first Week. Creation events on the first day include the creation of: time, Geometric Natural Law, Geometric Solids, Infrastructural/Qualitative Energy Flux Density; motion, ‘waters’ heavens, etc. , see ‘GENESIS CHRONOLOGY & GENEALOGY – Greek Septuagint – Case #6 – Parts 1 and 2 of 2 @ http:// grebens.org; also 'Creation Management Laws - Uniqueness of the Bible - Definition,' @ http://grebens.org; and 'Matter: Nothing or Geometry - Definition,' @ http://grebens.org.

The 2nd Singularity identifies a second set of Divine Creation during the 2nd week of Creation: duration: day 8 through 14, with the a) creation of Adam (Gen.2:7); b) Eden and Edenic set of creatures (Gen. 2:8; 2:19); c) Adam’s wife Eve (2:21), and d) together (Adam and Eve) made a crucial decision. Adam, who had been brought into the position of the CEO (Chief Executive Officer) of Creation (Gen.2:20), used his free will to make an out-of-policy decision that introduced ‘imperfection.’(Gen 3:6) This imperfection, or sub-perfection, resulted not only in a breech with the God (Executive Board Member) (Gen.3:7ff), but also resulted in a drop of 1 cycle on the Infrastructural Qualitative Energy Flux Density Cone throughout the realm that had been Created - that had been placed under Adam’s responsibility. This one cycle energy drop led to having Creation 'starve' for qualitative energy - a cycle that had also introduced ‘death.’(Gen.3:14ff)

The 3rd Singularity includes events and effects of the Global FLOOD – in two effects. The duration of the 1st effect lasted a ‘twelve-point-ten months’ (12.10 months) - Gen. 7:6 through to Gen. 8:13-14; from the beginning of: 2262 YFC ('Year From Creation') – i.e., from 3247 B.C.; to the start of 2263 YFC (3246 B.C.). The 2nd effect lasted much longer – this included the post Global Flood ‘self-adjustments’ period that lasted between 1500 years to our day. This included the rapid draining of the Flood’s waters around the world, up to 50,000 surface and underwater volcanic activities, continued raising of mountains and creation of basins; geological perturbations; climatological and temperature inversions, one 805-year-long Ice Age (2970 B.C. to 2170 B.C.) within 272 years after the end of the Global Flood; the raising of ocean levels (up to 500 feet at the Equator and 100 feet at north and southern hemispheres) after the melting of Ice Age blocks after the Ice Age (2040 B.C.) – this occurred with the reduction of volcanic activity, cooler oceans, clearing of the skies allowing higher solar penetration.

Regarding the 2nd Singularity and its importance at the time of Jesus Christ’s 1st Advent – 5415 YFC (Year From Creation) -.i.e., 5 B.C. The 1st Advent was designed to fulfill the Covenantal requirements - to abolish the 2nd Singularity’s ‘death.’ Note that instead of choosing (i.e., free will) the fruit of the Tree of Live – spiritual existence (Gen.2:9), Adam chose the fruit that led to death – ‘the tree of learning the knowledge of good and evil’ (Gen.2:17; 3:6). As discussed in other articles, this second tree represents – i.e., the supervisory plans: policies (D4), procedures (D5), rules and regulations (D6) on the management design infrastructure on the 3DMM*2. In other words, Adam and Eve deprioritized the executive plans: purpose (D1), objectives (D2) and strategies (D3) and selected the supervisory plans.

After Adam introduced ‘death’ and the ‘one-cycle drop of energy flux density in all of Creation’ on the 14th day of the 2nd Week - 1st Month of the year ‘0’ YFC)*3; the Eternal Lord God was correct this ‘death’ penalty sentence (Gen.3:21) as the second Adam from the 1st Singularity and replace it with life – the Resurrection (Mat 28; John 20)*4. In other words, the Eternal Lord God who:

1. During the 1st Singularity, 7433 YFC ago, had Created the perfect Universe and established the Divine Covenant with Adam (Gen.2:15)
2. Returned (5417 YFC later), and with His perfection (1st Singularity) (Luke 1:35)
3. Corrected Adam’s erroneous decision that had initiated the 2nd Singularity (Rom.5:12ff)
4. The second Adam passed the Eve/Adam’s soul test (Eden) – see the three temptations in the wilderness (Mat. 4)
5. Paid the penalty – i.e., someone who had the characteristics from the 1st Singularity (Luke 2:30), paid fully for someone who had introduced ‘death’ (2nd Singularity); thus:
6. Made the second Adam made the right decision (the ‘Tree of Life’) that the first Adam could not - ‘the tree of learning the knowledge of good and evil’ (Gen.2:17; 3:6) – to ensure that Adam’s righteous descendants’ will inherit the original intent of spiritual (eternal) sonship and daughtership (1 Cor. 15:35ff); and
7. Re-open the original Covenantal union with the Eternal Lord God (Mat 27:51; Rom. 5:10) – New Marriage Covenant.

Note2: This salvation from death is the 1st of 2 parts. The second consequence of 2nd Singularity – i.e., natures/Creation’s drop of 1 cycle down the energy flux density infrastructure, is awaiting the resurrection and change of Adam’s righteous descendants into spiritual beings – ‘For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it in hope; because the creation itself also will be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation groans and labors with birth, pangs together until now. Not only that, but we also who have the Firstfruits of the Spirit even we ourselves groan with ourselves eagerly waiting for the adoption, the redemption of our body…” (Rom.8:20ff).

Needless to say, the materialist uniformitarian / neo-evolutionists (MUN) can’t conceive or see the need for the existence of the three Christian Biblical singularities. MUN see, accept and reason within the conditions of the degraded 2nd Singularity reality. It is upon this that MUN define their ‘materialism.’ It is only this reality that yields to economic validity. Similarly, MUN do not see any practical relevance to the existence of the 1st Singularity since this too cannot be converted into a practical economic formulae. Within the MUN dictionary of definitions*5 the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Singularities are simply reduced to the realm of mythology. Yet, as it is shown on this issue, MUN overlook an enormous complexity of the situation.

In this study, for example, it will partially be shown that there are other Singularities in addition of the existing three Singularities. Two of which are usually highly oversimplified – the Resurrection (5th Singularity) – as it will partially be shown here; and the 2nd Coming (6th Singularity).

Heavenly Corrections and Parallels

The Biblical Passover did not only address and resolve the 2nd Singularity. In addition the Passover helped correct and address several other anomalies:

1. The Divine Covenant of marriage with Israel (Ex.19:3-8); and a divorce in the case of: Eternal Lord God vs. Israel, because the Northern Israelite 10 Tribes’ transgressions and adulteries (Jer.3:8); but did not divorce a similarly wavering Judah – because the Messiah’s lineage was to come through Judah. The Messiah (the Covenantal ‘Husband’) was prophesied to die - to allow Him to re-establish a Second Marriage Covenant with the Children of Israel (Mat.25:10; Heb.8:6-13).

Note3: check Figure 39 – ‘Genesis Chronology & Genealogy – Greek Septuagint – Case #6, Part 2 of 2’ @ http://grebens.org and also ‘Materialism/Physicalism – Part 2 of 5' @ http://grebens.org – to help distinguish among, and not to confuse those who are of the true Israelites and those of the descendants of Japheth, and Babylon).

2. Exodus documents that the Children of Israel miraculously crossed the Sea, while Egyptians who pursued them, perished in the sea (Ex.12:37; 14:1-ff). This Exodus Passover event parallels events recorded in the New Testament Passover (see Figures 42 and 43).

3. The Passover week during Jesus Christ’s 1st Advent – i.e., 2nd week of the 1st Month of Abib, traces how Jesus Christ corrects the earlier transgressions that were made in the Garden of Eden that also occurred on the calendar - 2nd Week of the 1st Month). These corrections were being conducted day by day and hour by hour – see the Garden of Eden and during the 1st Advent Passover (see Figures 42 and 43).

Note4: During the 1st Advent Passover, a) Judas’ role presents a unique development; b) reveals much about the Jerusalem priest and high priest’s theories and practices ‘traditions of the Elders’ – the Babylonian ‘modernist’ interpretative methodology of the Old Testament scriptures – as it is being accomplished today. This approach led to a pluralism and relativism emanating from the supervisory rather than an executive application and interpretation of the scriptures. For example, on the one hand, when wise men came ‘from the East (i.e., Parthia) to Jerusalem’ (Mat.2:1-11) and asked directions to the location where the promised Ruler was to be born, the priests were able to correctly interpret OT Prophecy, and correctly directed the Parthian sojourners to Bethlehem. Similarly the chief priests and Pharisees were keen to note that Jesus Christ was to rise after three days and they needed to place guards to prevent possible deception (Mat. 27:62-66). However, from these two points the Jerusalem priests, scribes, lawyers, high priests did everything to stop Christ’s Mission - salvation from the effects/ byproduct of the 2nd Singularity’s ‘death.’

Note5: There were some in the Jerusalem Temple that recognized Christ’s mission – e.g., Simenon (Luke 2:22-27), Prophetess Anna (Luke 2:36-37), Zacharias – the father of John the Baptizer (Luke 1:57), Nicodemus (John 3:1; 19:39); also Jesus’ uncle Joseph of Arimathea who had great influence among the Romans and Jerusalem priesthood, also being a member of the council (Mark15:43; John 19:38).

Judas’ Role During Passover

Judas Iscariot’s personality, activity and effect in the New Testament are not a random entry. The Christian New Testament doesn’t record when and under what circumstances Judas had been included among Jesus Christ’s disciples.

The first apostles were chosen and mentioned in Mat 4:18-22; 10:2-4; Mark 1:16-20; 3:16-19; Luke 5; 6:13-16; John 1:37-43; Acts 1:13. In Galilee among the Benjaminites, Jesus chose two sets of brothers: Simon Peter and Andrew, and James and his brother John (Mat 4:21-22); then Philip and Bartholomew; Thomas and Matthew; James, Lebbaeus, Simon the Canaanite; Nathanael (Luke 6:12), Judas Iscariot (Mat 10:1-3). However, Judas Iscariot is mentioned last in the list of the twelve apostles who are being sent out to preach to the lost sheep of Israel – Mat. 10:1; Mark 3:13.

Throughout the gospels, until the actual Passover meal, Jesus Christ had predicted the betrayal (Mat. 12:17; Luke 9; Luke 18:32). And it is after a woman anointed Jesus Christ’s head with very costly fragrant alabaster oil (Mat 26:7; Mark 14:5), and specifically heard that this was for ‘His burial’ (Mat 26:11) that Judas decided to take matters into his hands and used betrayal as a means to change the outcome - more about this later.

How can Judas’ character, motivation, decision and strategy be explained? Was there a character weakness, intellectual summation of options that culminated to commit betrayal and then to suicide?

1. Judas, like all other eleven apostles, was young, energetic and had been a ‘Christian’, i.e., follower of Christ’s way.
2. As a member of the twelve apostles, Judas had been sent out to the lost sheep of Israel to preach that the kingdom of heaven had arrived (Mat 10). Judas had seen Jesus Christ’s miracles, and had been given authority to ‘heal the sick, raise the dead, cleanse lepers, and drive out devils. To give these things as he received them without pay. He was not to take gold, silver, or copper money…’ Mat. 10:7ff
3. Judas heard Jesus Christ’s pronouncements against the hypocritical and serpentine priests, Pharisees, Sadducees, Sanhedrin, and scribes – their murderous ways against all the righteous throughout history (Mat.23)
4. In spite of Apostle Matthew’s proven financial expertise as a tax collector, it was Judas who took charge of the ‘company’s assets, budget and cash flow’ (John 13:29)
5. It is Judas’ name that sheds some light on his character. He is known as: Judas, the son of Simon, the man from Kerioth (John 6:70)

Kerioth city is identified in Joshua 15:25 as being one of the cities in Judah bordering Edom (Esau’s country). Later Jeremiah 48:24 and Amos 2:2 mention that the Moabites occupied Kerioth. Kerioth, a town of ‘Moab’, had been plundered. Moab had ‘burned the bones of Edom,’ and was defeated, and Kerioth suffered the curses which befell Moab (Jer. 48). During Amos’ time Kerioth’s palaces were destroyed.

It is important to identify what role Esau (Edom), played throughout history, and in what way has his country, in the proximity of Kerioth, affected Judas’ ethical formation and contributed to Judas’ inclination towards finance, cunning and strategic betrayal. These factors may shed some light on Judas’ inclination and objectives:

1. Judas was naturally attracted to Jesus Christ’s mission because he anticipated Jesus Christ’s messianic ‘worldwide’ operation in which he would possess an insider’s advantage
2. Judas viewed reality through the financial prism - he carried the corporate moneybag (John 13:29). Management accounting, budgets, minimization of liabilities and maximization of assets – where the dynamics of his thinking.
3. During this Passover, Judas perceived an unexpected turn of events. For some unknown reason, Jesus Christ was being anointed (Mat 26) in preparation for His death. We read that Jesus’ Apostles reacted with indignation when a woman used an alabaster flask of very costly (300 pence) fragrant oil, poured it on His head Mat 26:7-8; Mark 14:4-5 *6. Neither was this their concern for the poor (Mat 26:11; Mark 14:7). Nor had it been for the anointer’s former profession and her behavior (Mat. 26:10ff). None of this prompted any of the 12 Apostles to betray Jesus Christ. The single detail that only Judas’ financial mind was able to detect was that his CEO was preparing for burial, and this meant that Judah’s position as an apostle – i.e., the ‘inner circle’ position was being jeopardized – it was not only ending but was coming to a crash – i.e., the closure of all accounts. Under such circumstances, the accountant’s mind began to reel, and in a flash he calculated several corrective measures. Quickly, he also realized that the magnitude of this challenge demanded that of the many alternatives that his mind conjectured he had to crystalize just one solution that would guarantee success – i.e., he had to quickly create an external threatening condition that would force Jesus Christ to utilize His miraculous competencies that would help overcome that threat - i.e., as Jesus Christ had done successfully so many times before.
4. Judas knew exactly who could create such an external threat? The Chief Priests, the High Priest, Pharisees, Sadducees, Sanhedrin, Herodians, the elders – there were so many of them - those who were even willing to pay for information leading the whereabouts and when Jesus Christ could be arrested. Both Judas and the high level authorities and prosecutors had some common grounds lineage and common language – money.
5. Judas completed the transaction, but he didn’t read close enough the contractual terms and conditions , nor did he know the High Priest’s master plan: (a) the scenario didn’t play out according to Judas’ understanding; (b) Jesus Christ didn’t include His miraculous counter measures; (c) Instead Jesus Christ allowed himself to fall victim to the High Priest’s plan. On this theater stage Judas appeared as a small street merchant (thirty shekels of silver) who played a key but small part among the strategic plans of the financial sharks who learned their Banking science in Babylon*7, and now dealt with the Roman Governors. Judas’ didn’t realize that his activity confronted four challenges: (1) Jesus Christ’s predestined plan of Salvation (5th Singularity); (2) at least two plans worked against (1) that of Babylon and later Rome; (3) Blindness of the participants, and (4) Judas’ own limitations.
6. In addition, to having now contributed to his CEO’s trials and His inevitable execution; while searching for additional solutions, (d) Judas inevitably realized that his brothers and sisters in Christ – the Apostles, His Mother and hundreds of the many disciples will now also be subject to a contract of death. Judas’ miscalculations; his now evident faulty reasoning, his participation in a game that was too big for him; his increasing guilt for having ‘betrayed innocent blood’ (Mat. 27:3); the horror of this situation as he functioned in what appeared to be an abysmally empty world; the accountant’s mind and tortured soul, functioning on the Supervisory rather than the Executive management level; here liabilities pointed him only in one direction – and Judas took it - a seeming release from mounting anguish*8 *9 *10.

2, 4, 5, 6 Singularities vs. Son of Perdition

In the above section, Judas’ situation is examined at a human level. Judas’ life as an apostle of Jesus Christ appeared to be normal except that during the last Passover, events have led him to make several key yet flawed decisions that set him under increasingly complicated pressures, which inevitably culminated into his inevitable demise. Here we see that not only had Judas tried to use the Jerusalem Temple High and Chief priests into achieving their end (arrest, trials and crucifixion of Jesus Christ); but Judas also tried to manipulate conditions to get Jesus Christ to do things that were outside the original mission.

Yet clearly Jesus Christ’s additional characterization of Judas shows that there existed additional layers that had to be considered. In John 17:12 Jesus Christ identifies Judas Iscariot as ‘the son of perdition.’

What does this designation mean? The English word ‘perdition’ is used 7 additional times in the New Testament - Phil. 1:28; 2 Th 2:3; while I Tim 6:9 quote ‘the rich fall into …drowning destruction and perdition); and the final four quotations: Heb. 10:39; 2 Peter 3:7; Rev 17:8, 11 *11. However, the combined words - ‘son of perdition’ is used twice: 1) John 17:12 refers specifically to Judas of Kerioth*12; and 2) 2Th 2:3 the term ‘son of perdition’ is associated with a prognostication to the ‘end times’ where Judas’ profile is viewed in a winning anti-type role: ‘Let no man [1] deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, [2] unless the falling away comes first, and [3] that man of sin be revealed, [4] the son of perdition, [5] who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God, or [6] that is worshipped; so [7] that he sits as God in [8] the temple of God, [9] showing himself that he is God.’

It appears that the term ‘son of perdition’ is associated with a prophetic ‘end time’ event; and Figure 43 shows that Judas’ planning was triggered on the 10th of the 1st month of Abib*13; led to total failure on the 12th of Abib, i.e., a duration of less than 48 hours.

To better understand Judas Iscariots’ profile, role and objectives, it is necessary to understand not only the prophetic signs laid down by the Singularities, but also to help us understand how the misunderstanding of these Singularities has today diverted Christians unto the road that leads towards the ‘son of perdition’.

Both Figures 42 and 43 help us map these prophetic signs, but also the road towards the ‘son of perdition’ and beyond. The first three Singularities have been addressed on Figure 39 – Genesis Chronology – Genealogy (see articles on http://grebens.org) and summarized above:

Singularity: 1st [original perfect divine creation – first 7 days of Creation, 5510 B.C - Gen. 1 – 2:3]

Singularity: 2nd [the drop of one cycle in the energy flux density, and ‘death’ – 10th thru 18th of the second week of Creation, 5510 B.C.]

Singularity: 3rd [Global Flood – 17th day 2nd Month, 3247 B.C., Gen.7:6-11 through to 1st Day of the 1st Month (Abib) (Gen 8:13-14)].

Figure 42 – ‘Annual Quarters, Biblical Holy Days and 7 Singularities’ lists the remaining 4 Singularities:

1. The 4th Singularity – Supernatural birth of Jesus Christ (1st Advent) ‘Day of Atonement’ – 7th Mth.
2. The 5th Singularity - ‘Resurrection’ (correction of 2nd Singularity – death to life) ‘Passover’ – 1st Mth
3. The 6th Singularity – 2nd Advent ‘Day of Atonement’ – 7th Month
4. The 7th Singularity - Great Day, the ‘Great Judgment Day’ – 7th Month.
5. The 8th Singularity - Kingdom of Heaven – ‘Feast of Tabernacles’ – 7th Month

How does all this play out?

Perfect ‘divinely designed’ original Creation – during 1st week (7 days) of the 1st month in the Year ‘0’ YFC (Years From Creation) or 5510 B.C.; with perfect designs throughout the Universe – that were supported by the pre-installed: geometric natural law; geometric solids, infrastructural energy flux density – everything was established and was divinely considered to be ‘good’. This was the 1st Singularity.

The Eternal Lord God introduces a risk factor into His Creation during the second week of the 1st Month, year ‘0’ YFC, by creating Adam with a soul /psyche) [see 2nd infrastructure (Supervisory row) on the 1st 3DMM infrastructure – i.e., Management Design – see Figure 5, and Tables 2 and 3]. The risk factor for introducing a soul/psyche is that this creation was allowed to have ‘free will.’ Adam, appointed as the CEO (Chief Executive Officer) of Creation, made a faulty ‘decision’ i.e., he introduced ‘imperfection’ and ‘death’ over everything that was under his responsibility, during the second week of Creation – see Figure 43 ‘10th through 15th days of 1st Month of year ‘0’ YFC – this is the 2nd Singularity. This ‘imperfection’ multiplied and culminated in the 3rd Singularity in 2262 YFC (see Figure 39).

Towards of the end of the 2nd Singularity, the Eternal Lord God made a covenant with Adam by replacing the fig leaf covering with an animal skin covering, which during the 1st Advent (coming of the Eternal Lord God in the form of man (4th Singularity) – this was the coming of the 2nd Adam that was created perfect during the 1st Singularity to pay for and to correct Adam’s sin (Eden) – from death to the resurrection into eternal life (the Tree of Life) – this is the 5th Singularity. This was the 1st of 2 parts of correcting the 2nd Singularity – i.e., removing death, uniting man with God, and the resurrection into eternal life (the Tree of Life). The 2nd part of the 2nd Singularity, as noted above, was to have the saved, resurrected and changed into spiritual beings to ‘fix’ the groaning Creation – i.e., to repair and re-introduce the 1st Singularity status to creation. It is important to note that Jesus Christ was not a simple prophet with high level competencies for producing miracles. Instead Jesus Christ was born as a man with 1st Singularity perfect features who had a specific salvation mission – teaching and endowing mankind that was contaminated by the deadly effects brought out of the 2nd and 3rd Singularities.The Old and New Testaments are documents that reflect this prophetic mission. More specifically, the NT contains the initiative brought from the 1st Singularity - in other words, how to become a Christian with 1st Singularity’s features, action and life – Christ-like or true Christian. Anyone who wishes to discover the standards and conditions that existed during the 1st Singularity can find such clues in the New Testament – a condition that existed before the introduction of the destructive elements of the 2nd and 3rd Singularities.

This prophetic message was documented and carried by the Biblical patriarchs - descendants of Shem (Semites), then branched to the Hebrews and then specifically through the lineage of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (Israelites) – for details see Figure 39 – Genesis Chronology – Genealogy – Greek Septuagint Version’ @ http://grebens.org. Someone had to carry this mission throughout history. It was those who had been given the 10 Commandments, the original Israelite Kings, and Prophets leading to Jesus Christ traced a lineage from King David and Solomon through Mary - His earthly mother. All of Jesus Christ’s disciples were Benjaminites (of Israel) except Judas Iscariot (see above for description). Just as the Jerusalem Chief and High priesthood, and Judas Iscariot had a similar lineages and had brought in idolatries genetically woven as described in the 1st and 2nd Commandments Ex.20: 3-6 ‘…shall have no other gods before Me. You shall not make for yourself an idol or a likeness of anything in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, or in the waters under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, recompensing the sins of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generation of those who hate Me; but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and Keep My commandments.’ It is necessary to recognize that the 10 Commandments’ God is not just any monotheistic or pantheistic god. Instead, the ‘I am your God’ – of the descendants of the lineage from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (Israel)’ is the Creator (1st Singularity) and the comer to pay the sacrifice (4th and 5th Singularities). During the 1st Advent, He is neither the god of the Babylonian Jerusalem priesthood (pluralism) nor Him of the financial imperative. The latter had an oral scriptural tradition, and only used the Biblical Old Testament as reference, while interpreting these through Babylonian ‘Modernist’ methodologies. This is why the High Priests of the Jerusalem Temple didn’t recognize the true Messiah, his Mission and had Him crucified. Judas of Iscariot was close to the pluralist Babylonians; Judas understood their language and program, but had been with Jesus Christ, saw His miracles, teachings, was given the ability to miraculously heal people when he was sent out to the Israelites. Yet, Judas’ inherent weakness is identified in the first two commandments (Ex 10:3-6) (see above). So his hybrid character of two faiths and the idolatrous lineage led him not only to a disastrous personal conclusion, but also provided a profile of the end-time ‘son of perdition.’ More specifically, we can include the mixture of: false/idolatrous gods (priorities) and consequences of idolatry i.e., an economic perspective: controls, issues of security - i.e., the inclusion of such items such as layered degrees of fairness, theft, fines, penalties, criminal syndicates, imprisonment, courts, tax, etc; the maximization of margin/profit, which leads to a perceptions of ‘success’= ‘righteousness’, ‘failure’ = unrighteousness; the power to manage material means and power influence. This contributed to a blindness to the Eternal Lord God’s plan and priorities – which in this perspective was viewed as an economically impractical plan. Judas’ accounting, as did Herod’s engineering of the Temple in Jerusalem, combined with the Jerusalem priesthood’s convenient design and management of a quasi-religious/ideological and political system helped control the multitudes of contributing faithful. Judas’ contribution to this religious/economic model was to introduce miracles/magic and justified plan for divinity management.

Continued in Part 2 of 2

MODERNISM - HISTORICAL ROAD TO - Case #8 (C) 2010 and 2011

Dr. George Grebens

http://grebens.org

See also: http://WhichOnesAreScientific.com; http://grebens.com, and http://grebens.net

Update: 23 January, 2011

Original Post: 18 January, 2011

Returning to Evolution-Young Earth Creation-I.D-Hybrid*1 debate, it should be remembered that in spite of the spin that the media, academia, social science provide about the 'scientific' certainty that the uniformitarian simple-to-complex evolution offers, in the past the same evolutionary views among the early Greeks for example, had been set within pure mythology - i.e., without any scientific content, foundation or derivatives [see also 'Caravaka's Materialist Model' (India 6th century B.C.) - 'Materialims/Physicalism - Definition - Parts 3 and 5 of 5' @ http://grebens.org]*2. The Greek philosophers*3 - specifically Aristotle, as well as, the pantheistic religious worldviews*4 today have not changed. We see this in such expressions such as - evolution 'plans', 'changes', and 'decides'. This may, of course, be simple metaphorical expressions, but we also find that at the United Nations, there are plans to ensure that all people would 'believe in evolution.'*5 This persuasion that evolution (materialist uniformitarianism) 'lives' and it is believed through the consensus of most modern scientists, has even influence mainstream Christian Churches and denominations. For example, event the mighty Roman Catholic Church, under Pius XII ('Humani Generis', 1950) had reflected this 'speciation' that occurred. So much so, that Pope John Paul II, who was influenced and immersed in the writings of the 'Modernists' had succumbed to the evolutionary, or more specifically, Theistic Evolutionary theory, via the works of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881 - 1955) (see also the concept of 'Theolusion' @ http://grebens.com.)

Where and how did the modernist uniformitarian view originate and progress to its fruition in the modern world? The starting point can be located in a number of historical areas. There are historical events, church authority practices, demographic changes that have brought about influences and posed challenges that were 'solved' in the 14-16th centuries West Europe within a context of a hidden agenda. One may ask the question that if some quasi-Protestants didn't agree with Papal administration, why didn't they chose to become Orthodox Christians – a religion that earlier existed among the Celts*6. This alone is a separate question, but it is generic to the 'secret agenda' that existed at the time and motivated the 'Reformation/Protestant' initiative (see details in: 'Measuring Ideologies & Religions - the Spider Web Tool - Parts 1 & 2 of 2' @ http://grebens.org). Briefly, one must mention the notion of the 'Christian apostolic succession', which is modeled on the system that existed under the Old Testament – the marriage covenant that was maintained through patriarchs, kings, and prophets who were all of the Israel Tribes*7 Due to the condition of the Divine Covenant, non-Israelites who attempted to imitate what the Judahites/Israelites believed and followed*8 could not be covered under the Divine Covenant with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

90% of Protestants rejected 'Apostolic succession' - a New Covenantal Tradition (bishops and presbyters – priests, and the Church), and had a total antipathy to anything that anchored the Covenant – the Holy/Sacred Traditions - the manner in which the Apostles interpreted the Scriptures, thus focusing on Sole Scriptura - only scriptures and Sole Fide - only faith. Protestants, therefore, eliminated the:

1. Holy (Apostolic) Traditions
2. Church Authority (bishops and presbyters) - and
3. Simply maintained 2/3rds of the Holy Scriptures.

In other words, if one were to compare what the Protestants did with that practiced during the Old Testament times, then this would correspond to:

1. Eliminating all of the Holy (patriarchal, kingly and prophets) Traditions
2. Eliminating the original Patriarchs, who also functioned as priests until the establishment of the Aarronites and Levites
3. And would have simply kept some scriptural works. For example, few realize that the Northern 10 Tribes of Israel simply had the Mosaic Law of the Bible (5 first books), and didn't have the history of the Israelite Kings and Prophets.

Similarly, the original Ecumenical Councils (1st to 7th), which were initiated by Constantine the Great of Constantinople (4th century AD), were used to help resolve issues that increasingly splintered the Christians. Christians used some basic books of the New Testament, but did not have guidelines to the complete the New Testament Canon until the 5th century AD. Constantine the Great commissioned 50 Bibles to be created and distributed during after the initial Ecumenical Councils. Constantine convened such Ecumenical Councils where all Christian bishops and presbyters (priests) where to pray, function under apostolic authority and resolve these and other scriptural issues..

A thousand years later Protestants questioned the three key Christian foundations: Holy/Sacred apostolic traditions, Church authority and role of the now 'truncated' scriptures. Luther's hidden agenda provided the formula for re-prioritizing issues that contributed to dismantling Christendom. It is upon his approach to the three pivotal questions – Holy Traditions, Church Authority and the manner in which one looks at the Scriptures that lead the subjective and relative foundation upon which the 16th century's Rationalism, Empiricism and later uniformitarianism, reductionism and modernism continued *9.

The subjectivism can quickly be examined, identified and located at the programming/coding of key nouns (instead of verbs) with its trigger and automatic emotional response. For example see 'History 'So Called': Galileo, Crusades & Inquisition - Case #4' @ grebens.org, also 'Tendatious American Media - 'Scopes Trial' (1925)' @ http://grebens.org, and many others. Under such circumstances, such key programmed nouns are designed to set off emotionally - upon one specific 'definition' and 'feeling' that close any further route to exploration and scholarly analysis. This subjectivist programming leads to reactions (timed bombs) that are very similar to, or actual hypocondriac reactions. Example, mention just 1 to 6 programmed/trigger nouns, e.g. 'Roman Catholic's holy statues, images and icons, results in the only possible meaning = idolatry'; 'the veneration of the 'Virgin Mary' = idolatry, blasphemy'; 'the proof of a recent Creation (Biblical) = pseudo-scientific cultism and brain-washing' *10; 'individual development, private property = counter-revolutionary (Marxist) dangerous delusions'; 'anti-materialism = anti-semitism'; 'anti-Obamacare = racism.' After all, all you need is a 500-word vocabulary to keep you on the straight and narrow path? Such emotional programming is designed to strap a mind into a cage beyond whose bars one may find only: error, deviation, insanity, criminal intent - a sado-masochistic experience (see George Orwel's 'Nineteen Eighty Four' and 'Animal Farm' for visid examples). Such is the context of materialist uniformitarianism (Theory of Evolution) - that leads to 'Zombism' - see 'Science & the Scientific Method vs Zombiism - Part 3' @ http://grebens.org.

During many written/published and high level public debates one can easily identify and follow a flurry of such programmed emotionally laden vocabulary that result in circular logic, negativism, blocked reasoning, sub-textual accusatory implications.

Similarly, other emotional key words are programmed to immediately exhibit unfounded positive exhiliration, trigger standing applause, and 'evidence' of 'heroism' and that of 'true believers'. Both results of programming can clearly be identified among the cultists. What a difference exists between the strategies towards Church reforms used by Martin Luther and Francis of Assisi!

It is also worth noting similarities in cult building methods used by Luther, the rationalists, empiricists, reductionists, modernists, the secretive Freemasonry and Talmudism, and Behaviorists. This is basically the reinstatement of the Babylonian mindset - controls used by the graded authority, and which are contrary to true 3DMM (science) and the DMPS (scientific method). It is clear that members of these groups sing from the same music sheet:

1. Remove all existing purposes, laws, objectives, strategies, history
2. Replace all authority, priorities, standards
3. Structure all beliefs and social norms on economic, narrower scopes of ‘naïve realism’ (e.g., relativistic interpretation, sensory-based reason and accommodate social conveniences, relativistic, materialistic policies, procedures and rules/regulations and traditions; mystery and secrecy)
4. Arbitrary adoption of standards for determining self-development, improvement and self-perfection
5. Ambiguous notions of long-term economics (monetarist), and
6. Unstable criteria and use of output*11.

Instead of solving issues for qualitative resolutions, the outcome has become a continuous breakdown and fragmentation of the systems and awareness. What has remained constant is the increased polarization, fragmentation and animosity towards one another and all established constants. This resulted in a dismantlement and total takeover and re-direction of an originally developing Christian culture that was based on lawful and scientific foundations – i.e., pursuit of accurate knowledge and conversion of uncertainty to conditional and qualitative certainty.

The Historical, Methodological and Strategic Trail

Martin Luther's subjectivism led to Kant’s idealism - pure reason (see 'Romanticism' exalting the cult of the self and raising sentiment over reason”), and then more specifically to works and philosophies of: Ferdinand Christian Bauer (1792-1860), David Friedrich Strauss (1808-74), Renan 1823-1892) with their view on the ‘mythical view of Christ’ (a Gnostic tradition)*12 Friedrich Ernst Daniel Schleiermacher (1768-1834) (Revelation is a subjective fruit), Ritschel (1822-89). Henry Bergson’s (1859-1941) evolutionary philosophy – reality is not the stable being which we know with our minds but a pure becoming to which intuition is our only guide*13. Maurice Blondel – who in 'Action' (1893) developed the principle of intellectual autonomy according to which man cannot be subjected to an outside truth. Fr. Alfred Loisy (1857-1940) – depicted an opposition between the Christ of history and the Christ of faith. George Tyrrell (1861-1909) – personal mysticism with a theology of intuition over intelligence – revelation belongs to the category of impression and not expression. Teilhard de Chardin herald the coming of a new Messiah – Super-Humanity destined to rule in place of Jesus Christ, reaching the final Omega Point (qualities of God himself). Two existentialists: Kierkegaard, Husserl and Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) (phenomenology – facts of consciousness) and also – moralists: Father Wojtyla (future John Paul II), Max Scheler, and personalists: Maritain, Mounier and later: Camus, Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre. Among the neo-modernists thee are: Ricaeur, Rahner, Father Henri de Lubac (1892-1991) continued on the foundations laid by Teilhard de Chardin, and reaches out to the whole world – other religions who may have some truth – a pioneer of Vatican II. Both Ratzinger and John Paul II had been De Lubac’s intellectual heirs. Rudolf Bultman (1884-1976) investigated historical formation of the Gospel by applying a scalpel to cut the Gospels into a thousand pieces. Karl Rahner establishes a new theology - pure existentialism. ‘Anthropological inversion’ – Joseph Ratzinger’s future professor, who promoted the subjectivist view in opposition to Church authority and traditions.

It should be noted that Vatican II was forced into session by the Modernists who dominated it and set its agenda – creating the most unusually Catholic Council in the history of the RC. This same trend is becoming visible via the “Modernist” Ecumenical Councils and the World Council of Churches among many the Christian Orthodox Church and Protestant denominations – specifically among those who promote the mid- and full-Liberal trend. In this exercise man of the Orthodox Christian Churces - e.g., the 'Masonic' Greek Orthodox Church and the Russian Orthodox Church have essentially jumped from the 7th Ecumenical Council (7th century AD), to accomodate the 21st Roman/Modernist Vatican 2 Council (20th century)*14.

To better understand why the Roman Catholic Church, Christian Orthodox Church and most of the Protestant denominations have opted for the Theistic Evolutionary or Progressive Creationist positions, it is necessary, in addition to the above, to recognize a significant difference between the original 7 Christian Ecumenical Councils (held between the 4th and the 7th centuries AD), and today's 21st Vatican 2 'Modernist Ecumenical Councils.(MEC).' One single difference is that now the dialog is not so much among Christian Churches and Denominations, but the dialog has moved to include the non-Christian religions, Ideologies and cults. Thus representing a true Roman Emperial Pantheon. Within this context, Christians (not only Roman Catholics) should ask themselves at least nine questions:

1. Are all members of the Modern Ecumenical Council (MEC) working towards Christian Orthodox truth? Is this the core of this new agenda?
2. Are Christians not Christian enough and therefore need to improve their Christianity and/or Orthodoxy by participating in the MEC – a therapeutic exercise!
3. Who are those who oppose or support the MEC, and what is the illusive middle ground that would help resolve the divisions?
4. Who has set the MEC's standards and agenda during the past multiple decades and what are the standards and long-term agenda?
5. What is the ultimate Purpose of the MEC? It was easy to determine the purpose and agenda in the early years of the original Ecumenical Councils: a) identify the true apostolic faith in view of the many opposing views that began to emerge and entrench themselves; and b) establish the canons, dogmas (universal divine laws). Yet today it is clearly not the points that are being addressed at the MEC?
6. From the time that the Modernist Ecumenical Councils emerged, the participating ‘Christian’ groups have multiplied a thousand fold – from 1,000 to 44,000+ denominations today. Familiar faces at the councils moved as representatives from one denomination to another, and then another.  Is it because they have seen a clearer picture of faith in the ever new (evolving) denomination? Or is to simply overwhelm/outnumber the two main Christian Churches - Roman Catholicism and Orthodox Christians.
7. Even if one were to demonstrate the true Christian path, how would this position be presented, and what other barriers will still exist, that others may not buy into it?
8. In an ever increasingly Secularized World (SW), wouldn’t it be ‘nice’ to have all Christians unite under a common initiative and effectively set the world right? Do any of the MEC members have the formula for accomplishing this? Or is there some underlying agenda that runs counter to all that Christianity has ever offered? How about the emergence of a Roman Modernist Church?
9. During the MEC we see the plan to include non-Christian religions, with the attempt to extend the Judeo-Christian experience and dialog methodologies, to incorporate a 'Judeo-Christian-Islamic'*15 understanding. And by using the: a) Judeo-foundation*16; b) the materialistic-uniformitarian approach, and c) the various re-definitions of terms and concepts - to extend this to include all other Religions and Ideologies into this Pantheonic fold *17. The last stage will most probably eliminate issues of 'Evolution' and 'Creation' and instead lead to formulating an Omega-based New Age awareness where everything becomes relative and possible-in-faith, not forgetting the allures that pharmaceuticals may bring.

Needless to say, not all anthropomorphic gods (man’s highest priorities) are equal. Some ‘gods’ are capricious, benevolent, evil, and others merciful. They are limited or bound by their capacity, psychology, personality, motivation, challenges and natural powers. All these ‘gods’ are bound by some temporal limitation - whether this time is in the past, present, future, whether it is continuous, perfective or described in terms of 'infinite' definitions. Just as humans, these gods are confined within the limitations of time, a management system and mental models *18.

The mind is temporal and thus can only generate temporal and pseudo-infinite scopes. When communicating about the highest priorities and values, the mind tends to use superlatives, anthropomorphic projections, and emotional intentions, economic and esthetically mystical descriptions. If a constructive dialog should continue among individuals, who recognize their mutating definitions and concepts, then the debaters will eventually realize the limitations of their linguistic scope and will explore two basic mathematical models – algebraic and/or geometric. Today, under the various inflences and inducements only the algebraic models are explored *19.

References--------------------------------------------------------

*1 Grebens, George (PhD), 'Evolution, Creation, Intelligent Design, Hybrid,' American university & Colleges Press, Utah, 2010; pages 215 - 220.

*2 See ' Note1: Some promote the false notion of a link where 'materialism=science & technology'; vs. 'religion=Medievalism.' It should be noted that Caravaka's materialist model (India, 6th century B.C.) had NOT developed into any type, or improved level of 'science' and 'technology,' or 'scientific method.' On the other hand, in Christian Europe - this is almost 2000 years later - true science (3DMM) and the scientific method (DMPS) had developed. It is in Europe - almost 2000 years after Caravaka's materialism - that Christianity created the favorable environment where true science (3DMM) and the scientific method (DMPS) had been developed. This was before the formulation of materialist uniformitarianism (similar to CARAVAKA's Materialist Model). Christian Europe had established all branches of science by the 18th and 19th centuries. This was accomplished without materialist ideological derivative input such as 'reductionism', 'relativism', 'empiricism', 'subjectivism,' 'secularism,' 'behaviorism,' and others mentioned earlier in these articles/blogs' see 'Materialism/Physicalism - Definition - Part 5 of 5' @ htpp://grebens.org.

*3 The term ‘evolution’ has not been used but the processes have been described: Thales suggests that all things originated from water; Anaximenes refers to the thickening and thinning of the air principle; Anaximander focuses on the concept of development from moisture under the influence of warmth, suggests long periods or change between animal to man. Empedocles, Epicarus and Lucretius build on this and suggest a type of natural selection. Heraclitus conceives a teleological rational development involving air to water and to earth with the involvement of the Logos who refines the process. See also http://www.iep.utm.edu./e/evolutio.htm.

*4 Ernest L. Abel, Ancient Views on the Origin of Life (Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1973); also Stanley L. Jaki, “Science: Western or What?” Intercollegiate Review (Vol. 26, Fall 1990); also, James Lovelock, The Ages of Gaia (New York: W.W. Norton and Co., 1988); also, Wolfgang Smith, Teilhardism and the New Religion (Rockford, Illinois: Tan Books and Publishers, 1988)

*5 Robert Muller, as cited in “United Nations’ Robert Muller – a Vision of Global Spirituality,” by Kristin Murphy, The Movement Newspaper, September 1983, p. 10.

*6 http://www.canto.ru/calendar/index_en.php is a calendar that contains the history and names of saints throughout Christian Orthodoxy including the Celtic world. This is one of the most complete and comprehensive records among many others.

*7 These Israelites are not to be confused with those of the contemporary State of Israel.

*8 For example, there were those non-Israelites (Edomites - Ezra 4:50) who were brought into and occupied the Israelite/Judahite territories after the latter had been taken into captivity and later returned to the Judahite/Jerusalem territories (Ezra and Nehemiah), these non-Israelites practiced the Judahite religion and wished to cooperate with the Judhaites in rebuilding of the Jerusalem Temple. However, even though the non-Judahite/Israelite Edomites practiced the Judahite beliefs and practices (Ezra 5:65), they were not allowed to participate in this Temple project, because among other things, the Edomites were not of the lineage of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (see Ezra Chapter 5:1ff).

*9 Abbe Dominique Bournaud, Cent ans de modernisme: Genealogies du concile Vatican II

*10 'Court Decisions on What is 'Scientific' - Case #5' @ http://grebens.org, also 'National Academy of Sciences' Rule Book - Case #2'' @ http://grebens.org, also 'Scientists - Professional and Ideological'' @ http://grebens.com

*11 Check these with Management Design plans, as well as with 3DMM and DMPS.

*12 See St Irenaeus, Conte les Heresise, in M-C. Ceruti-Cenrier, Les Evangiles Sont des Reportages (Paris: Tequi, 1997), pp. 324-25

*13 See Henri Bergson, “Creative Evolution”, translated by Arthur Mitchell, The Modern Library, New York, 1944.

*14 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Vatican_Ecumenical_Council

*15 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judeo-Christian-Islamic

*16 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judaism_and_world_religions

*17 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interfaith_dialog#Policies_of_religions_to_interfaith_dialogue

*18 see 'Economic-Mythological Vehicles - Part 2 of 5' @http://grebens.com; also 'Man's Brain's Prioritizing Capacity - Part 3 of 5' @ htpp://grebens.com;  also 'Measuring Ideologies & Religions - the Spider Web Tool - Case #7 - Parts 1 and 2 of 2 @ http://grebens.org.

*19 'Algebraic vs. Geometric Reality - part 4 of 5' @ http://grebens.com; also 'Matter: Nothing or Geometry - Definition' @ http://grebens.org; also 'Creation management Laws - Uniqueness of the Bible - Definition'' @ http://grebens.org